Ethical issues in Nipah virus control and research
Addressing a neglected disease
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21515084 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tess Johnson (0000-0003-2071-4302, University of Oxford, autor de correspondencia), Euzebiusz Jamrozik (0000-0001-5940-602X, The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Tara Hurst (0000-0001-5474-7132, University of Oxford), Phaik Yeong Cheah (0000-0001-6327-3266, Mahidol University), Michael Parker (0000-0002-7054-4711, University of Oxford) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 50 |
| Número | 9 |
| Páginas | 612-617 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-09-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257 |
| Editorial | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/jme-2023-109469 |
| PMID | 38071589 |
| OpenAlex | W4389510021 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 31 |
Nipah virus is a priority pathogen that is receiving increasing attention among scientists and in work on epidemic preparedness. Despite this trend, there has been almost no bioethical work examining ethical considerations surrounding the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of Nipah virus or research that has already begun into animal and human vaccines. In this paper, we advance the case for further work on Nipah virus disease in public health ethics due to the distinct issues it raises concerning communication about the modes of transmission, the burdens of public health surveillance, the recent use of stringent public health measures during epidemics, and social or religious norms intersecting with preventive measures. We also advance the case for further work on Nipah virus disease in research ethics, given ethical issues surrounding potential vaccine trials for a high-fatality disease with sporadic spillover events, the different local contexts where trials may occur, and the potential use of unproven therapeutics during outbreaks. Further bioethics work may help to ensure that research and public health interventions for Nipah virus disease are ethically acceptable and more likely to be effective
Bioethics · Disease · Ebola virus · Environmental health · Outbreak · Pathology · Political science · Preparedness · Public health · Public relations · Research ethics · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Virology and Viral Diseases · Zoonotic diseases and public health · Virology
Public Health Ethics
Piloting the use of indigenous methods to prevent Nipah virus infection by interrupting bats' access to date palm sap in Bangladesh
Vaccine ethics
Ethical allocation of future Covid-19 vaccines
A trade‐off
The Psychosocial Impact of the Environmental Damage Caused by the MT Merapi Eruption on Survivors in Indonesia
Climate Change Could Increase the Geographic Extent of Hendra Virus Spillover Risk
It’s not only what you say, it’s also how you say it
The World Is Not Mine – Barriers to Healthcare Access for Bangladeshi Rural Elderly Women
Ethical Rationale for the Ebola “Ring Vaccination” Trial Design
Institutions, cultural politics and the destabilizing Malaysian pig industry
Principles for the Justification of Public Health Intervention
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Altamente citado | No |