Is neutralization necessary for criminal behavior

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2152015
AutoresJoseph F Sheley (Tulane University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1980
Volumen2
Número1
Páginas49-72
Fecha de publicación1980-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDeviant Behavior (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0163-9625 • E-ISSN: 1521-0456
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01639625.1980.9967542
OpenAlexW2072002362
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10
Referencias citadas33

Criminological theories currently place much emphasis on neutralization of norms, i.e., extension or distortion of norms to allow guilt‐free infraction, as a key element in criminal behavior. This paper examines the major assumptions underlying the neutralization thesis and a critical alternative thesis, which argues that criminal beliefs rather than neutralizations permit criminal actions. Analysis of data from a sample of college students calls into question the neutralization theory assumption of homogeneity of moral values in this society. The alternative thesis is supported by the finding of variation in moral values and its link to differential criminal involvement. It is argued that this evidence precludes the need for a concept such as neutralization to account for criminal behavior

Criminal behavior · Criminal law · Criminology · Neutralization · Political science · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses