On the feasibility of general meanings in prepositional semantics

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21540720
AutoresAndreas Widoff (Lund University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen55
Número1
Páginas16-36
Fecha de publicación2023-01-02
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaActa Linguistica Hafniensia (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0374-0463 • E-ISSN: 1949-0763
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03740463.2023.2210423
OpenAlexW4381435041
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas26

The paper investigates the status of general meanings in prepositional semantics. On the basis of a review of the strategies employed in different accounts of prepositions, the paper argues that strict adherence to the notion of general meanings is unfeasible in the field, partly because a purely deductive method of description breaks down as the number of possible oppositions increases. This failure points to the need for a theoretical reformulation of the notion. The paper suggests that there are three conservative ways to pursue such a reformulation: by rejecting the idea that general meanings are autonomous from thought, by rejecting the principle of oppositional constitution or by rejecting the requirement of monosemy. The merits and flaws of these strategies are discussed and some theoretical and methodological motives in choosing between them are considered

Constitution · Epistemology · Linguistics · Political science · Pure mathematics · Sociology · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Law · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access