Student and school-level factors to predict science literacy for two top-performing countries in Pisa 2015
Finland and Singapore
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21589283 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ulaş Üstün (0000-0001-9974-6897, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey, autor de correspondencia), Mustafa Cansiz (0000-0002-7157-2888, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey), Ertugrul Ozdemir (0000-0002-6057-5944, Department of Basic Education, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey), Nurcan Cansiz (0000-0002-2336-3205, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 579-603 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-03-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Science Education, Part B (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2154-8455 • E-ISSN: 2154-8463 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09500693.2022.2037167 |
| OpenAlex | W4213015256 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 29 |
Finland and Singapore are both top-performing countries in international assessments such as PISA. Finland has been consistently one of the high-achievers regarding not only students’ literacy levels but also educational equity. Similarly, Singapore has continuously shown outstanding performance in PISA. It outperformed all the other participants in all three literacy domains in PISA 2015. We believe exploring the factors affecting students’ science literacy in these two top-performing countries will provide the low-performing countries with a useful guideline. In this regard, we aim to build models including the student and school-level factors associated with the students’ science literacy in Finland and Singapore using PISA 2015 data. We conduct Hierarchical Linear Modeling to create these models. The sample includes 5882 students in Finland and 6115 students in Singapore. The resulting models explain about 43% and 40% of the within-school variance while they explain 62% and 71% of the between-school variance in science literacy in Finland and Singapore respectively. At the student level, students’ enjoyment and interest in science are the most influential predictors of science literacy while at the school level, schools’ economic, social, and cultural status is by far the most powerful predictor of science literacy in both Finland and Singapore
Literacy · Mathematics education · Multilevel model · Pedagogy · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities · Mathematics · Psychology · School Choice and Performance
Exploring the association between non-specialised science teacher rates and student science literacy
English digital reading achievement for East Asian students
Pathways to early science literacy
The influence of ICT competencies on English digital reading achievement
Deciphering socioeconomic inequality in science literacy
Pisa 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework
Pisa 2015 Results (Volume III)
Pisa 2015 Results (Volume II)
Pisa 2015 Results (Volume I)
Research on Interest in Science
An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling
Meta-analysis of Grade Retention Research
Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement
Null
On the matter of teacher quality
The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys
Healthy competition and unsound comparison
Youth participation in the fight against Aids in South Africa
The Finnish miracle of Pisa
Rethinking the pattern of external policy referencing
Excellence through Special Education? Lessons from the Finnish School Reform
| Citas por año | 2,5 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Altamente citado | No |