Epistemic negotiations on a closed psychiatric ward
An Empirical Exploration
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21591729 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bram Salman (University Medical Center Utrecht, autor de correspondencia), Andries Baart (0000-0002-6328-3971), Andries Johannes Baart |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 3572-3603 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-11-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Philosophical Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0951-5089 • E-ISSN: 1465-394X |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09515089.2024.2376098 |
| OpenAlex | W4401364362 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 20 |
On a closed psychiatric ward, conflict and disagreement may exist between patients and psychiatrists on how to interpret the patient’s condition. This forms a complexity for implementing contemporary ideals such as shared decision making, which would require a substantial degree of epistemic flexibility from both psychiatrists and patients. Recently, authors have argued that psychiatrists are pluralistic and pragmatic in their interpretation of the patient’s condition, implying a space for this flexibility in the clinical encounter. In this article we present an empirical study in which we aim to describe, understand, and explain this epistemic space and the dynamics between the psychiatrist’s and patient’s interpretation. We aim to explore and contextualize philosophical discussions through empirical research. We performed a qualitative inquiry on a closed psychiatric ward and found that both patients and psychiatrists were epistemically flexible, but epistemic negotiations were more complex and variegated than often presumed. We constructed an empirically grounded typology of different types of epistemic interaction, which shows that this interaction can only be properly understood if one acknowledges that it is shaped by different professional, societal and personal norms and values. We conclude by discussing the scope and limits of the epistemic space that we found
Empirical research · Epistemology · Negotiation · Social science · Sociology · Typology · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Analysing Everyday Explanation
In care of the state
Understanding Narrative Inquiry
Some Remarks on the Typological Procedures in Social Research
Alliance in individual psychotherapy.
A philosophical exploration of experience-based expertise in mental health care
Epistemic injustice in psychiatric research and practice
Encyclopedia of sociology
Doing Qualitative Research
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires
Maps, Models, and Narratives
Institutionalised otherness
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |