Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Determining the scope of epistemic injustice within psychiatry

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21591783
AutoresThemistoklis Pantazakos (0000-0002-4993-191X, University College London, autor de correspondencia), Sarah Arnaud (0000-0002-3725-6224, Clemson University)
Año2025
Volumen38
Número8
Páginas3604-3629
Fecha de publicación2025-11-17
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPhilosophical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0951-5089 • E-ISSN: 1465-394X
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09515089.2024.2377291
OpenAlexW4400550594
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas46

In this article, we delve in debates around the usefulness of the notion of epistemic injustice in psychiatry to show that the concept has been misportrayed in the literature. We suggest that epistemic injustice should revolve around phenomenology and regard first and foremost the failure of mental health professionals to acquire and utilize information that service users are experts in, i.e. first-person testimony pertaining to what it is like to be them. We use this conceptualization to demonstrate the unique benefits that the concept of epistemic injustice can bring to psychiatric practice, and we illustrate these through specific case studies, focusing particularly on autism

Cognitive science · Epistemology · Injustice · Computer Science · Ethics in medical practice · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Bringing theoretical conceptions in psychiatry to epistemic justice

    Open Access•Mia Biturajac•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2026

  • Epistemic injustice in the healthcare system

    Christopher Ikechukwu Asogwa, Michael Chugozie Anyaehie et al.•Journal of Applied Communication…•2026

  • Neurodiversity, identity, and hypostatic abstraction

    Open Access•Sarah Arnaud, Quinn Hiroshi Gibson•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Epistemic Injustice

    Miranda Fricker•Epistemic Injustice•2007

  • The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice

    Ian James Kidd, José Medina et al.•The Routledge Handbook of…•2017

  • Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access

    Open Access•Ned Block•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2011

  • Epistemic injustice in psychiatry

    Open Access•Paul Crichton, Havi Carel et al.•BJPsych Bulletin•2017

  • ‘People should be allowed to do what they like’

    Open Access•Steven K Kapp, Robyn Steward et al.•Autism•2019

  • The new self-advocacy activism in psychiatry

    Sarah Arnaud, Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien•Philosophical Psychology•2024

  • Epistemic injustice in psychiatric research and practice

    Open Access•Ian James Kidd, Lucienne Spencer et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2025

  • Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice

    Anna Drożdżowicz•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  • Epistemic Injustice in Late-Stage Dementia

    Open Access•Lucienne Spencer•Social Epistemology•2023

  • The Neurodiversity Approach(es)

    Open Access•Patrick Dwyer•Human Development•2022

  • Epistemic injustice in healthcare

    Open Access•Havi Carel, Ian James Kidd•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2014

  • Measuring the impact of participatory research in psychiatry

    Open Access•Phoebe Friesen, Sapfo Lignou et al.•Health Expectations•2021

  • How is a sense of well-being and belonging constructed in the accounts of autistic adults

    David Milton, Damian Milton et al.•Disability & Society•2016

  • Two Kinds of Unknowing

    Open Access•Rebecca Mason•Hypatia•2011

  • Institutionalized Intolerance of ADHD

    Open Access•Susan Hawthorne, Susan C C Hawthorne•Hypatia•2010

  • The absent body in psychiatric diagnosis, treatment, and research

    Open Access•Chanel Stinson•Synthese•2019

  • Autism, epistemic injustice, and epistemic disablement

    Open Access•Amandine Catala, Luc Faucher et al.•Synthese•2021

  • Participatory Interactive Objectivity in Psychiatry

    Open Access•Serdar Tekin•Philosophy of Science•2022

  • The Unreliability of Naive Introspection

    Eric Schwitzgebel•The Philosophical Review•2008

  • Overcoming Hermeneutical Injustice in Mental Health

    Open Access•Rosa Ritunnano•Journal of the British Society…•2022

  • Treatment for whom? Towards a phenomenological resolution of controversy within autism treatment

    Open Access•Themistoklis Pantazakos•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2019

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae