Will Virtual Hearings Remain in Post-pandemic International Arbitration
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21593333 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lei Chen (0009-0003-4632-4932, Durham University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 37 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 829-849 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0952-8059 • E-ISSN: 1572-8722 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11196-023-10054-7 |
| OpenAlex | W4387311811 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
The pandemic has catalysed to hasten the wider use of virtual hearings in international arbitration. However, the promotion of virtual hearings in international commercial dispute resolution was more complex than commonly thought due to the highlighted concerns of cybersecurity and breach of confidentiality in arbitration. The worries against the wide use of virtual hearings cannot stand because technological innovations can largely improve and solve this. However, virtual arbitration hearings may not be common post-COVID times. Technology shapes how people behave, interact, grow, and develop in their relationships with others and wider communities. Yet greater immersion in the digital world undoubtedly creates new challenges and can adversely affect human-to-human interactions. There is very little scientific study on the psychological impacts of virtual hearings on arbitrators, witnesses and counsels. It is too early to assess its effectiveness from the user's perspective until the much-needed scientific data is released. Virtual hearings are unlikely to replace in-person ones necessary for more complex and high-value disputes requiring greater interaction and personal connection. Strategically, international arbitration is a private initiative-orientated, flexible, and market-driven dispute resolution mechanism. The parties are best positioned to choose the hearing format after balancing off
Arbitration · Business · Confidentiality · Dispute resolution · International arbitration · Internet privacy · Law and economics · Pandemic · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions · Law
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |