Psychological impact of Covid-19 on university students in Oman

An examination of stress, resilience and meaning in life

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21600935
AutoresMoon Fai Chan (0000-0002-2899-3118, Sultan Qaboos University), Tamadhir Al-Mahrouqi (0000-0002-7429-1504, Oman Medical College), Salim Al‐Huseini (0000-0002-6557-7033, Ministry of Health), Maryam Al-Mukhaini, Manar Al Shehi, Firdous Jahan (0000-0002-7066-5855), Mohammed Al‐Alawi (0000-0001-6388-5377, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital)
Año2023
Volumen123
Número3/4
Páginas105-119
Fecha de publicación2023-11-20
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth Education (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0965-4283 • E-ISSN: 1758-714X
EditorialEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/he-05-2023-0061
OpenAlexW4388550933
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas38

Purpose This cross-sectional online survey in Oman in April 2021 aimed to assess university students' resilience, stress levels and meaning during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify characteristic profiles. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from full-time students at one University in Oman. Outcomes included sociodemographic information, the brief resilience scale, the perceived stress scale-4 and the meaning in life questionnaire to explore the students' profiles. Findings A total of 964 students participated (response rate = 34.8%), of which 35% had low resilience scores. The average perceived stress, presence of meaning in life and search for meaning in life scores were 7.9 ± 2.3, 24.2 ± 6.9 and 24.9 ± 7.7, respectively. Cluster analysis identified three groups: low-risk and fewer impacts (cluster A, n = 503, 523%), moderate-risk and moderate impacts (cluster B, n = 160, 16.6%) and high-risk and more impacts (cluster C, n = 301, 31.2%). Cluster C students experienced more psychological problems and were at high risk during the pandemic. Research limitations/implications The respondents' honesty is a possible error that could influence the results. Low response rates limit its generalizability, and cause-effect relationships among mental health outcomes cannot be discerned. Practical implications This study identified three distinct groups of students, each with different levels of severity in their health problems. There is an increased need for education and counseling to support students during this period, and university management should focus on implementing personal precautionary measures and providing high-tech, user-friendly platforms for students to enhance their learning. Originality/value These findings suggest that tailored strategies should be developed to address the unique psychological needs of each group. The study provides important information for university management to understand the pandemic's psychological impact on students and develop effective interventions to support their well-being

Cross-sectional study · Developmental psychology · Generalizability theory · Mental health · Pandemic · Psychiatry · Psychological resilience · Clinical Psychology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout · Medicine · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology · Gerontology