Participatory urban planning in post-socialist Budapest
Insights from urban development documents (1990-present)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21601746 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bálint Hilbert (0000-0003-4633-4287, Institute for Sociology, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, autor de correspondencia), Lea Kőszeghy (0000-0002-0559-7753, Institute for Sociology, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence), Zsolt Szabolcsi (0000-0002-4682-7957, Institute for Sociology, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence), Adrienne Csizmady (0000-0002-8282-8623, Institute for Sociology, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 33 |
| Número | 10 |
| Páginas | 1692-1711 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-10-03 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | European Planning Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0965-4313 • E-ISSN: 1469-5944 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09654313.2025.2520386 |
| OpenAlex | W4411616709 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 26 |
Since limited scientific research has been conducted on the evolution of urban planning approaches in post-socialist countries and cities following the onset of democratic transformations in 1989/90, this paper examines urban planning in Budapest, Hungary, through a specific lens: the forms of public participation embedded in development plans and the narratives underpinning their necessity. Our research reveals that public participation is increasingly integrated into urban planning; however, significant and widening disparities exist between Budapest's districts regarding the types of public participation employed. These disparities are shaped by planning traditions, geopolitical factors, broader sociocultural trends, and institutional frameworks – particularly Budapest's highly fragmented institutional system. These findings highlight the importance of contextualizing planning practices within their specific sociopolitical and institutional settings. At the same time, progress in public participation must be assessed against the backdrop of declining local autonomy in Hungary in recent years
Citizen journalism · Civil engineering · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Participatory development · Participatory planning · Political science · Regional science · Sociology · Urban planning · Engineering · Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies · Urbanization and City Planning
The Post-Socialist City
Lack of Participatory Effort
Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development
Assessing public opinion using self-organizing maps. Lessons from urban planning in Romania
E-participation and engagement in urban planning
Planning trajectories in post-socialist cities
Public participation in post-communist cities between stagnation and progress
Szempontok a városi kormányzási elméletekhez Budapest, Bécs, Prága és Varsó közigazgatási helyzetének összehasonlítása alapján
Politics Without Meso-Level? No Politics at the Meso
Understanding strategic spatial planning to effectively guide development of urban regions
Streamline democratic values in planning systems
Co-Governance for Accountability
Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture
Participatory Budgeting as a Method for Improving Public Spaces in Major Polish Cities
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|