Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Female advantage in verbal learning revisited

A Hunt study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21602178
AutoresVanja Kljajević (0009-0009-3565-7081, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, autor de correspondencia), Hallvard Røe Evensmoen (0000-0002-2926-7476, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), D Sokołowski (0000-0002-8527-5585, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway), Jasmine Pani (0000-0002-3188-3585, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Tor Ivar Hansen (0000-0003-2503-6205, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Asta K Håberg (0000-0002-9007-1202, Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
Año2023
Volumen31
Número6
Páginas831-849
Fecha de publicación2023-07-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMemory (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09658211.2023.2203431
PMID37114402
OpenAlexW4367299311
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas66

4403) of individuals 13-97 years of age from the general population, we investigated whether this advantage is consistently reflected in learning, recall, and recognition and how other cognitive abilities differentially support word list learning. A robust female advantage was found in all subcomponents of the task. Semantic clustering mediated the effects of short-term and working memory on long-delayed recall and recognition, and serial clustering on short-delayed recall. These indirect effects were moderated by sex, with men benefiting more from reliance on each clustering strategy than women. Auditory attention span mediated the effect of pattern separation on true positives in word recognition, and this effect was stronger in men than in women. Men had better short-term and working memory scores, but lower auditory attention span and were more vulnerable to interference both in delayed recall and recognition. Thus, our data suggest that auditory attention span and interference control (inhibition), rather than short-term or working memory scores, semantic and/or serial clustering on their own, underlie better performance on word list learning in women

California Verbal Learning Test · Cluster analysis · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Free recall · Memory span · Population · Recall · Recall test · Short-term memory · Verbal learning · Working memory · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Computer Science · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • A model for the cognitive assessment of physicians

    Open Access•Victor A Del Bene, George Howard et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • How do menstrual cycle and emotional expressions affect attentional and memory biases

    Open Access•Özlem Ertan, Hasan Gunduz et al.•Current Psychology•2026

  • Imagery and verbal processes.

    Allan Paivio•Imagery and verbal processes.•1971

  • Mental imagery in associative learning and memory.

    Allan Paivio•Psychological Review•1969

  • Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression

    Open Access•Andrew F Hayes, Li Cai•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • Cohort Profile

    Steinar Krokstad, Arnulf Langhammer et al.•International Journal of…•2013

  • The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence

    Open Access•Michael J Kane, Randall W Engle•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2002

  • The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory

    Mark D’esposito, Mark D'Esposito et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2015

  • Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory

    Joan Gay Snodgrass, June Corwin•Journal of Experimental…•1988

  • Working memory

    Open Access•Alan Baddeley•Current Biology•2010

  • The gender similarities hypothesis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde•American Psychologist•2005

  • Memory

    Alan Baddeley, Michael W Eysenck et al.•Memory•2020

  • Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect

    Open Access•Janet Shibley Hyde, Elizabeth Fennema et al.•Psychology of Women Quarterly•1990

  • Sex Differences in Semantic Categorization

    Open Access•Vickie Pasterski, Karolina Zwierzynska et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2011

  • What did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory

    Martin Asperholm, Nadja Högman et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2019

  • New trends in gender and mathematics performance

    Sara M Lindberg, Janet Shibley Hyde et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • Gender differences in verbal ability

    Janet Shibley Hyde, Marcia C Linn•Psychological Bulletin•1988

  • Human behavioral sex differences

    Marcia L Collaer, Melissa Hines et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1995

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae