How social entrepreneurs’ attention allocation and ambidextrous behavior enable hybrid organization

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21620110
AutoresWenzhi Zheng (0000-0002-7515-8721, Huaqiao University), James W Bronson (University of Wisconsin–Whitewater), James Bronson, Chunpei Lin (0000-0001-8448-6308, Huaqiao University)
Año2020
Volumen31
Número3
Páginas509-528
Fecha de publicación2020-04-30
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Conflict Management (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1044-4068 • E-ISSN: 1758-8545
EditorialEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/ijcma-10-2019-0188
OpenAlexW3020429242
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas64

Purpose This paper aims to explore the social entrepreneurs’ attention allocation and their resource action that lead to hybrid organization using the paradox theory. Paradox theory deepens understandings of the varied nature, dynamics and outcomes of entrepreneurial tensions. This study explores the systematic effects of internal and external attention on both economic and social performance. Design/methodology/approach First, theoretically, hypotheses linking different attention allocations to ambidextrous behavior and entrepreneurial performance were formulated. Subsequently, the empirical studies based on Chinese social entrepreneurship were conducted to test the hypotheses. Findings The study provides support to the hypotheses showing that external attention is linked to resource acquisition and social performance, while internal attention is linked to resource acquisition and strategic human resource management and thus these ambidextrous behaviors promote both social and economic performance. Furthermore, normal pressure moderates the relations between internal attention and strategic human resource management only. Research limitations/implications The research measures entrepreneurs’ attention with questionnaire rather than psych test. Also, static data rather than longitudinal research is designed to test the hypotheses. Practical implications Deeper understanding of the attention of social entrepreneurs and resource action can help entrepreneurial outcomes and can potentially contribute to paradox and tension management by entrepreneurial practitioners in China. Originality/value Social entrepreneurs’ different attention allocation and related entrepreneurial ambidextrous behavior processes are linked to paradoxical thinking for the first time. The findings of this research can potentially enhance social entrepreneurship paradoxical thinking aimed at preventing mission drift

Business · Creativity · Economics · Empirical research · Entrepreneurship · Human resource management · Knowledge management · Management · Originality · Resource allocation · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Family Business Performance and Succession · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Psychology · Social Psychology