Italian validation of the mentalization scale (MentS)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21620596 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Marina Cosenza (0000-0002-5813-017X, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", autor de correspondencia), Barbara Pizzini (0000-0001-5234-4823, International Psychoanalytic University Berlin), Mariagiulia Sacco (0000-0002-8587-7287, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"), Francesca D’Olimpio (0000-0002-9669-0127, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"), Alda Troncone (0000-0002-4641-6314, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"), Maria Ciccarelli (0000-0002-7285-1707, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"), Aleksandar Dimitrijevic (0000-0002-3221-2767, Giustino Fortunato University), Giovanna Nigro (0000-0003-3518-2468, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli") |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Número | 29 |
| Páginas | 24205-24215 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Current Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12144-024-06071-9 |
| OpenAlex | W4396742057 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 51 |
The research aimed to assess the reliability, factor structure, and validity of the Italian adaptation of the Mentalization Scale (MentS), a 28-item self-report questionnaire that measures mentalization across three dimensions. The psychometric properties of the Italian version were examined in two studies with large samples of adults and adolescents. The first study (Study 1) aimed to evaluate, through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the construct validity of the Italian version of the MentS in adolescents ( N = 618) and adults ( N = 720). The second study (Study 2) was undertaken to test the convergent validity and temporal stability of the Italian version of the MentS. Specifically, the study assessed the relationship between the MentS and scores on the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8), one of the most widely used instruments to assess mentalization, in a large sample of high-school students ( N = 472). Furthermore, the study evaluated the 4-week test-retest reliability of the instrument in a sample of undergraduates ( N = 128). The questionnaire exhibited strong internal consistency across both adult and adolescent samples, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.71 to 0.83. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses consistently identified three correlated underlying factors within both age groups, demonstrating the robust factor structure of the Italian version of the MentS. Furthermore, the tool demonstrated strong convergent validity with the RFQ-8 and acceptable test-retest reliability over a 4-week period. These findings provide compelling evidence supporting the Italian version of the MentS as a reliable and valid self-report measure for comprehensively assessing different facets of mentalization
Cartography · Mentalization · Psychotherapist · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder
Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing
Reflective Functioning Scale
The Mentalizing Approach to Psychopathology
Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Mentalization Scale in the general population and patients with schizophrenia
A Critical Evaluation of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ)
The Need for Alternative Measures of Fit in Covariance Structure Modeling
Mentalization-Based Parenting Program for Child Maltreatment Prevention
Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in People at Risk for Food Addiction
The Psycho-Analytic Study of Thinking
Eating Disorders and Mentalization
Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |