Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Fictitious conspiracy, paranormal, and pseudoscience beliefs are closely related to their regular counterparts

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21621411
AutoresSinan Alper (0000-0002-9051-0690, Yaşar University, autor de correspondencia), Tugcenaz Elcil (0000-0002-8948-4157, Dokuz Eylül University), Nazif Karaca (0000-0001-9976-9722, Yaşar University), Fatih Bayrak (0000-0001-6350-6234, Başkent University), Ozlem Yilmaz (0000-0002-6094-7162, Kadir Has University), Onurcan Yilmaz
Año2025
Volumen44
Número7
Páginas6376-6395
Fecha de publicación2025-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCurrent Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s12144-025-07654-w
OpenAlexW4408257415
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas41

Belief in various types of Epistemically Suspect Beliefs (ESBs), such as conspiracy theories, paranormal phenomena, and pseudoscientific claims, tends to strongly correlate. However, the use of ESB scales in the literature, which often include phenomena frequently encountered in daily life with familiar content, challenges the clarity of inferences about this relationship. To address this issue, we developed a scale for Fictitious Epistemically Suspect Beliefs (FESBs), composed entirely of novel and fabricated statements related to conspiracy, paranormal activity, and pseudoscience. In Study 1, with a Turkish sample of 448 participants, we found that FESBs positively correlated with ESBs, despite consisting of less familiar claims. Moreover, both FESBs and ESBs showed similar associations with individual differences in worldview and cognition. These findings were replicated in a larger Turkish sample ( N = 786) in Study 2, and a UK sample ( N = 746) in Study 3. The results indicate that individuals with higher ESBs are more likely to endorse FESBs, despite having never encountered these claims before

Paranormal · Pseudoscience · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking

    Open Access•Gordon Pennycook, Jonathan A Fugelsang et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2015

  • Tearing apart the “evil” twins

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Tisa Bertlich et al.•Current Opinion in Psychology•2022

  • The dirty dozen

    P K Jonason, Gregory D Webster•Psychological Assessment•2010

  • Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Anthony Lantian, Dominique Muller et al.•International Review of Social…•2016

  • Climate change

    Karen M Douglas, Robbie M Sutton•Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists•2015

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Most people are not Weird

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Nature•2010

  • Psychological correlates of Covid-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures

    Open Access•Sinan Alper, Fatih Bayrak et al.•Current Psychology•2021

  • Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals

    Open Access•Felicia Pratto, Atilla Cidam et al.•Social Psychological and…•2013

  • A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale

    Open Access•Jerome Tobacyk, Jerome J Tobacyk•International Journal of…•2004

  • Do as the Romans do

    Open Access•Angelo Fasce, Jesús Adrián‐Ventura et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Karen M Douglas, Robbie M Sutton et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2017

  • Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Robert Brotherton, Christopher C French et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures

    Open Access•Martin Bruder, Peter Haffke et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Dead and Alive

    Open Access•Michael J Wood, Karen M Douglas et al.•Social Psychological and…•2012

  • Investigating right wing authoritarianism with a very short authoritarianism scale

    Open Access•Boris Bizumic, John Duckitt•Journal of Social and Political…•2018

  • Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale

    Open Access•Caitlin Drummond Otten, Baruch Fischhoff•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2015

  • The Dark Triad of personality

    Open Access•Delroy L Paulhus, Kevin M Williams•Journal of Research in Personality•2002

  • Dangerous and competitive worldviews

    Open Access•Ryan Perry, C G Sibley et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2013

  • Too special to be duped

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Pia Lamberty et al.•European Journal of Social…•2017

  • There are higher levels of conspiracy beliefs in more corrupt countries

    Open Access•Sinan Alper•European Journal of Social…•2023

  • Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Ted Goertzel•Political Psychology•1994

  • Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria

    Open Access•Viren Swami, Rebecca Coles et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2011

  • Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making

    Open Access•Shane Frederick•The Journal of Economic…•2005

  • Misinformation on Misinformation

    Open Access•Sacha Altay, Manon Berriche et al.•Social Media + Society•2023

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae