Belief in Pigs' Capacity to Suffer
An Assessment of Pig Farmers, Veterinarians, Students, and Citizens
Datos Bibliográficos
Intensive animal production practices lead to animal suffering worldwide. This study examined whether farmers cope with the negative impact of farming practices on their animals by ascribing them less capacity to suffer compared with other species. Most people like eating meat but find animal suffering emotionally disturbing. Human omnivores employ a variety of strategies to navigate this "meat paradox," and one of these is to reduce their perception of animals' capacity to suffer. Psychological defenses associated with meat-eating have been widely researched, but this study provides the first investigation into how these are employed amongst those involved in meat production and focusses on intensive pig producers as an example. Seventy-six pig farmers reported their belief in pigs' capacity to experience pain, hunger, fear, and boredom in a paper-based survey employing visual analogue scales. Their responses were compared with their perceptions of livestock that they did not farm (cows) and two companion animal species (dogs and cats). These results were compared with people who had similar experience of working with pigs (15 specialized pig veterinarians) and those who had no experience of pigs (23 agricultural students, 22 animal science students, and 58 citizens unrelated to agriculture). The results of the 194 responses provide evidence to suggest that the pig farmers did not ascribe their animals a diminished capacity to suffer. Rather, pig farmers expressed an enhanced belief in pigs' capacity to experience hunger. All comparison groups expressed widespread belief in each species' capacity to suffer. Nevertheless, dogs were the species judged to be most capable of suffering, and animal science students gave the highest suffering scores overall. Farmers are directly responsible for the welfare of their animals, and further investigation into the psychological and behavioral strategies of farmers may provide insight into non-financial reasons behind the generally slow progress in improving animal welfare
Agriculture · Animal production · Animal science · Animal welfare · Animal-assisted therapy · Biology · Boredom · Livestock · Perception · Pet therapy · Pig farming · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Meat-related cognitive dissonance
Happy Hens or Healthy Eggs – A Summative Content Analysis Of How Hens Are Represented In Supermarket Egg Boxes Narratives
How conflicted are farmers about meat? livestock farmers’ attachment to their animals and attitudes about meat
Measuring Human Beliefs About Nonhuman Animal Emotions
Livestock and Pets
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk
Can Pets Function as Family Members?
Rising Consumption of Meat and Milk in Developing Countries Has Created a New Food Revolution
Human‐Animal Bonds I
Food Security
Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions
Children Who Choose Not to Eat Meat
Dealing with Ambivalence
Belief in Animal Mind
The Motivational Bases of Attitudes Toward Animals
Can you have your meat and eat it too? Conscientious omnivores, vegetarians, and adherence to diet
Underlying differences between conscientious omnivores and vegetarians in the evaluation of meat and animals
Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns
Health, ethics and environment
Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters
The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals
Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history
Meat eaters by dissociation
The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals
The humanity of what we eat
How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators
Science versus Human Welfare? Understanding Attitudes toward Animal Use
Attribution of Cognitive States to Animals
Resolving the Meat-Paradox
Intergroup Contact
Animal science student attitudes to farm animal welfare
Stakeholder attitudes toward farm animal welfare
Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind
Factors affecting the Human Attribution of Emotions toward Animals
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,83 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |