Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Impact of Unmodeled Heteroskedasticity on Assessing Measurement Invariance in Single-group Models

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21641638
AutoresLaura Kolbe (0000-0003-0769-3391, University of Amsterdam, autor de correspondencia), Terrence D Jorgensen (0000-0001-5111-6773, University of Amsterdam), Dylan Molenaar (0000-0001-7108-4545, University of Amsterdam)
Año2021
Volumen28
Número1
Páginas82-98
Fecha de publicación2021-01-02
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1070-5511 • E-ISSN: 1532-8007
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10705511.2020.1766357
OpenAlexW3041720839
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas58

This study compared two single-group approaches for assessing measurement invariance across an observed background variable: restricted factor analysis (RFA) and moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA). In MNLFA models, heteroskedasticity can be accounted for by allowing the common-factor variance and the residual variances to differ as a function of the background variable. In contrast, RFA models assume homoskedasticity of both the common factor and the residuals. We conducted a simulation study to examine the performance of RFA and MNLFA under common-factor and residual homoskedasticity and heteroskedasticity. Results suggest that MNLFA and RFA with product indicators outperform RFA with latent moderated structural equations in conditions with heteroskedastic common-factors, and MNLFA outperforms RFA in conditions with residual heteroskedasticity. We provide an explanation for the robustness of RFA with product indicators to violations of common-factor homoskedasticity

Algorithm · Econometrics · Economics · Factor analysis · Heteroscedasticity · Homoscedasticity · Residual · Statistics · Chemistry · Computer Science · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Mathematics · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Accounting

  • Academic Procrastination Scale-Short (APS-S)

    Open Access•César Merino‐Soto, César Merino-Soto et al.•BMC Psychology•2026

  • Human-machine communication privacy management, privacy fatigue, and the conditional effects of algorithm awareness on privacy co-ownership in the social media context

    Open Access•Matthew Craig•Computers in Human Behavior•2025

  • A Comparison of Regularization, Alignment, and a Traditional Method for Estimating Structural Relationships Across Two Groups

    Emma Somer, Carl F Falk et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2026

  • Influence of College STEM Program Participation on Persistence Among First-Generation Engineering Students

    Open Access•David Diaz, Bo Hyun Lee et al.•The Counseling Psychologist•2025

  • People are variables too

    Paras Mehta, Michael C Neale•Psychological Methods•2005

  • Item bias and item response theory

    Open Access•Gideon J Mellenbergh•International Journal of…•1989

  • On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

    Robert C Maccallum, Shaobo Zhang et al.•Psychological Methods•2002

  • What to do when scalar invariance fails

    Herbert W Marsh, Jiesi Guo et al.•Psychological Methods•2018

  • A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research

    John L Horn, John J Mcardle•Experimental Aging Research•1992

  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Latent Interaction Effects with the LMS Method

    Open Access•Andreas Klein, Helfried Moosbrugger•Psychometrika•2000

  • OpenMx

    Open Access•Steven M Boker, Steven Boker et al.•Psychometrika•2011

  • Variance Components Models for Gene–Environment Interaction in Twin Analysis

    Shaun Purcell•The Marketing Review•2002

  • On the Merits of Orthogonalizing Powered and Product Terms

    Todd D Little, James A Bovaird et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2006

  • Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance

    Herbert W Marsh•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1994

  • A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling

    Jörg Henseler, Wynne W Chin•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2010

  • A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.

    Open Access•Daniel J Bauer•Psychological Methods•2017

  • MplusAutomation

    Michael N Hallquist, Joshua F Wiley•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2018

  • Structural Equation Models of Latent Interactions

    Herbert W Marsh, Zhuoyi Wen et al.•Psychological Methods•2004

  • A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature

    Open Access•Robert J Vandenberg, Charles E Lance•Organizational Research Methods•2000

  • Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic

    Open Access•Albert Satorra, Peter M Bentler•Psychometrika•2010

  • Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance

    Open Access•William Meredith•Psychometrika•1993

  • Modeling Interactions Between Latent Variables in Research on Type D Personality

    Open Access•Paul Lodder, Johan Denollet et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2019

  • Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Structural Equation Models With Multiple Interaction and Quadratic Effects

    Andreas Klein, Andreas G Klein et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2007

  • Exploring Factor Model Parameters across Continuous Variables with Local Structural Equation Models

    Andrea Hildebrandt, Oliver Lüdtke et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2016

  • A Unidimensional Latent Trait Model for Continuous Item Responses

    Gideon J Mellenbergh•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1994

  • Recent Methods for the Study of Measurement Invariance With Many Groups

    Open Access•Bengt Muthén, Tihomir Asparouhov•Sociological Methods & Research•2018

  • An Essay on Measurement and Factorial Invariance

    William Meredith, Jeanne A Teresi•Medical Care•2006

  • Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables

    D A Kenny, Charles M Judd•Psychological Bulletin•1984

  • Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures

    Barbara M Byrne, Richard J Shavelson et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1989

Citas por año4
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae