Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Mapping Ecosystem Conservation Priority Based on Social Assessment, a Tool to Assist Land Use Planning

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21649777
AutoresMa Luján Ahumada (0000-0003-3251-1713, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) CCT Córdoba Córdoba Argentina, autor de correspondencia), Laura Cavallero (0000-0002-7630-003X, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) CCT Córdoba Córdoba Argentina), Marcos H Easdale (0000-0003-1097-5242, Sistemas Pastoriles, Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias de Bariloche (IFAB) INTA‐CONICET San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina), Pablo Tittonell (0000-0002-0284-2514, Agroécologie), Dardo R López (0000-0001-9709-0070, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) CCT Córdoba Córdoba Argentina)
Año2025
Volumen36
Número3
Páginas754-777
Fecha de publicación2025-02-15
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.5391
OpenAlexW4404660297
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas139

The lack of planning regarding the spatial location and extent of different anthropogenic activities (such as agricultural production, biodiversity conservation, tourism, and urbanization) results in unsustainable land use and occupancy. Unplanned land use change threatens the supply of ecosystem services (ES) and thus, human well‐being. Reversing this requires participatory land use planning that includes the stakeholders who inhabit the territory. Here, we analyze the social assessment of ES and its spatial representation on a map of Ecosystem Conservation Priority (ECP). In participatory workshops, we used the Analytic Hierarchy Process to characterize the assessment of stakeholders about the ES provided by forest landscapes. Among the ES analyzed, all stakeholders prioritized ES associated with hydrological regulation (Watershed Conservation Potential). Most stakeholders assigned a lower value to provisioning ES than to supporting and regulating ES, except for Agribusiness and Farmers. In addittion, we integrated social assessments with spatially explicit information through Multicriteria Modeling which allowed us to map ECP. Finally, we generated a map of consensus and dissent regarding ECP which can be used as input for land use planning. The highest consensus levels (86.45%) were mainly located in the upper watershed. In contrast, lower consensus levels (7.88%) were located mainly in plain areas of degraded and fragmented native forests. These results suggest that the ongoing transformation of forest ecosystems is linked to tensions that prioritize urbanization and agricultural activities as opposed to agroforestry land uses. Efforts to prevent the degradation of natural ecosystems require planning that addresses the complexity of social‐ecological systems

Business · Civil engineering · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land use · Land-use planning · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Engineering · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Soil and Land Suitability Analysis · Ecology

  • Urban ventilation network identification to mitigate heat island effect

    Open Access•Aokang Xu, Jing Shi et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2025

  • Hospitality and tourism trends drive spatial shifts in urban service accessibility

    Open Access•Ye Ai, Mengyao Tian et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2025

  • Forest tree breeding under the global environmental change

    Open Access•Chenglin Li, Baochen Li et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • Analytic hierarchy process

    Open Access•Omkarprasad S Vaidya, Sushil Kumar•European Journal of Operational…•2006

  • GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis

    Jacek Malczewski•International Journal of…•2006

  • Classifying drivers of global forest loss

    Open Access•Paulette G Curtis, Christy M Slay et al.•Science•2018

  • Unidades de vegetación de la Argentina

    Open Access•Mariano Oyarzabal, José Clavijo et al.•Ecología Austral•2018

  • Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Eckehard G Brockerhoff, Luc Barbaro et al.•Biodiversity and Conservation•2017

  • Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences

    Open Access•Ivy B Huang, Jeffrey M Keisler et al.•The Science of The Total…•2011

  • A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Benson C Sherrouse, Jessica Clement et al.•Applied Geography•2011

  • Impact of land use change on ecosystem services

    Open Access•Shaikh Shamim Hasan, Lin Zhen et al.•Environmental Development•2020

  • The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia

    Open Access•Terefe Tolessa, Feyera Senbeta et al.•Ecosystem Services•2017

  • Diverse values of nature for sustainability

    Open Access•Unai Pascual, Patricia Balvanera et al.•Nature•2023

  • High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

    Open Access•Matthew C Hansen, Peter Potapov et al.•Science•2013

  • Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment

    Open Access•Kai M A Chan, Patricia Balvanera et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2016

  • Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity

    Open Access•Eric F Lambin, Patrick Meyfroidt•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Cuál es la situación de la Ley de Bosques en la Región Chaqueña a diez años de su sanción? Revisar su pasado para discutir su futuro

    Open Access•Sebastián Aguiar, Matías E Mastrangelo et al.•Ecología Austral•2018

  • Socio-naturalezas hídricas, turismo y espirales de riesgo ambiental

    Open Access•Gabriel Garnero•Estudios Rurales•2023

  • Tierra y veneno. La expansión de la frontera agropecuaria en el Gran Chaco Argentino y sus conflictos socio-ambientales (1990-2017)

    Open Access•Adrián Gustavo Zarrilli•Revista de Paz y Conflictos•2020

  • Strong relationships between urbanization, landscape structure, and ecosystem service multifunctionality in urban forest fragments

    Open Access•Matthew G E Mitchell, Tahia Devisscher•Landscape and Urban Planning•2022

  • “Se quedan con todo, no nos queda nada”. Acaparamiento de Tierras y Aguas en la Región Chaqueña, Provincias de Chaco y Salta (Argentina)

    Open Access•M I Castilla, Mariana Schimidt•Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana…•2021

  • Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Ana P García-Nieto, Elias Huland et al.•Ecosystems and People•2019

  • Using natural capital and ecosystem services to facilitate participatory environmental decision making

    Open Access•Caitlin Hinson, Jimmy O’keeffe et al.•People and Nature•2022

  • Multicriteria GIS ‐based analysis for the evaluation of the vulnerability of the marine environment in the Gulf of Trieste (north‐eastern Adriatic Sea) for sustainable blue economy and maritime spatial planning

    Open Access•Mariangela Pagano, Michele Fernetti et al.•People and Nature•2023

  • Relational values of forests

    Open Access•L Yuliani, M Moeliono et al.•People and Nature•2023

  • Land Use Change and Commodity Frontiers

    Daniel M Cáceres, Esteban Tapella et al.•Case Studies in the Environment•2020

  • The Global Forest Transition as a Human Affair

    Open Access•Claude García, Claude A Garcia et al.•One Earth•2020

  • Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation

    Open Access•Samantha S K Scholte, Samantha Scholte et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services

    Open Access•Christopher M Raymond, Jasper O Kenter et al.•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Direct and indirect loss of natural area from urban expansion

    Open Access•Jasper van Vliet•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Scanning the solutions for the sustainable supply of forest ecosystem services in Europe

    Open Access•Mónica Hernández‐Morcillo, Mario Torralba et al.•Sustainability Science•2022

  • Assessing social values of ecosystem services in the Phewa Lake Watershed, Nepal

    Open Access•Kiran Paudyal, Himlal Baral et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Making a bridge between livelihoods and forest conservation

    Open Access•Jun Harbi, James T Erbaugh et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning

    Open Access•Jayanath Ananda, Gamini Herath•Forest Policy and Economics•2003

  • A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change

    Open Access•Terry Sunderland, Rabdo Abdoulaye et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • The role of soybean production as an underlying driver of deforestation in the South American Chaco

    Open Access•Verena Fehlenberg, Matthias Baumann et al.•Global Environmental Change•2017

  • An integrative approach to evaluate ecosystem services of mountain lakes using multi-criteria decision analysis

    Open Access•Veronika Fontana, Manuel Ebner et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • Nuevas formas de politización y conflictos socio-ambientales en el mundo rural argentino

    Open Access•Adrián Gustavo Zarrilli•Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana…•2016

  • Rush for cash crops and forest protection

    Open Access•Thoumthone Vongvisouk, Rikke B Broegaard et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • How rural actors relate to nature. Perceptions of ecosystem services in the semi-arid Chaco of northern Argentina

    Open Access•Gisela Soledad Córdoba, Elena Zepharovich•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Social sensitivity analysis in conflictive environmental governance

    Open Access•Serafin Corral, Serafín Corral-Quintana et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2017

  • The application of ecosystem assessments in land use planning

    Open Access•Rafael Córdoba Hernández, Federico Camerin•Futures•2024

  • GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis

    Open Access•Randal Greene, Rodolphe Devillers et al.•Geography Compass•2011

  • From biophysical to social-ecological trade-offs

    Open Access•Matías E Mastrangelo, Pedro Laterra•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • The social value of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the perspectives of different social actors

    Open Access•Daniel M Cáceres, Esteban Tapella et al.•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • Mapping social values of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Laura Nahuelhual, Felipe Benra Ochoa et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

  • Trabajo en común

    Open Access•Julieta Quirós•Cuadernos de antropología social•2020

  • A tipping point for agricultural expansion? Technological changes and capital accumulation in Argentina's rural sector

    Open Access•Daniel M Cáceres, C Gras•Journal of Agrarian Change•2020

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae