Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

How Do We Measure and Increase Systems Thinking? Comparing Self‐Reported and Performative Metrics in Response to Building Causal Loop Models

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21651886
AutoresCynthia Mcpherson Frantz (0000-0003-2544-9245, Oberlin College Oberlin Ohio USA, autor de correspondencia), Julia Blotner (Oberlin College Oberlin Ohio USA), John E Petersen (0000-0002-6907-8418, Oberlin College Oberlin Ohio USA)
Año2026
Volumen43
Número2
Páginas629-649
Fecha de publicación2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSystems Research and Behavioral Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1092-7026 • E-ISSN: 1099-1743
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sres.3208
OpenAlexW4415724349
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas52

Systems thinking is a mindset and skill essential to understanding and addressing complex challenges. However, increasing and measuring systems thinking is difficult. In this research, we compared multiple approaches to measuring systems thinking, including self‐reported measures of a systems thinking mindset and performative measures of systems thinking skills (i.e., participants' reasoning about a system and metrics derived from participants' causal model diagrams of a system). We also evaluated whether systems thinking is specific to disciplinary domains (ecological vs. economic). Finally, we assessed whether building causal models increased systems thinking. Self‐report and performative measures of systems thinking were related but not redundant. Metrics derived from participants' models correlated with some but not all measures of systems thinking. Systems thinking partially generalizes across domains. The process of creating models increased self‐reported, but not performative, measures of systems thinking. Measuring systems thinking appears to require a multimethod approach that includes performative assessment

Causal loop diagram · Causal model · Mindset · Performative utterance · Systems thinking · Chaos, Complexity, and Education · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Embodied and Extended Cognition

  • Systems Object Framework

    Narmin Ghalichi, Anita Schuchardt et al.•International Journal of Science…•2021

  • Modeling the relationship between students' prior knowledge, causal reasoning processes, and quality of causal maps

    Open Access•Hyoung Seok Shin, Areum Jeong et al.•Computers & Education•2021

  • The mind is an ecosystem

    Paul H Thibodeau, Paul Thibodeau et al.•Metaphor and the Social World•2016

  • Assessing Novelty and Systems Thinking in Conceptual Models of Technological Systems

    Open Access•Rea Lavi, Yehudit Judy Dori et al.•IEEE Transactions on Education•2021

  • The Effectiveness of a Systems Engineering Course in Developing Systems Thinking

    Open Access•Fanny Camelia, Timothy Ferris et al.•IEEE Transactions on Education•2020

  • Real possibilities

    Open Access•Melinda Kirk, Joseph Paul Ferguson•International Journal of Science…•2025

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae