Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Take five? A coherentist argument why medical AI does not require a new ethical principle

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21702316
AutoresSeppe Segers (0000-0001-8231-6487, Ghent University), Michiel De Proost (0000-0003-0545-8515, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen45
Número5
Páginas387-400
Fecha de publicación2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMetamedicine (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0166-2031 • E-ISSN: 1573-1200
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11017-024-09676-0
PMID38850486
OpenAlexW4399462131
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas44

Alternative medicine · Bioethics · Coherentism · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethical theory · Medical ethics · Medical law · Philosophy of medicine · Philosophy of science · Political science · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI · Law · Medicine · Philosophy

  • Can AI principlism without explicability be coherent? A response to Segers and De Proost

    Open Access•Jonathan Adams•Metamedicine•2025

  • Take another five. A response to Adams

    Open Access•Michiel De Proost, Seppe Segers•Metamedicine•2025

  • The Way We Reason Now

    John D Arras, Bonnie Steinbock•The Oxford handbook of bioethics•2009

  • Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics

    Open Access•David O Brink•Moral Realism and the Foundations…•1989

  • Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI

    Open Access•Brent Mittelstadt•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • The uselessness of AI ethics

    Open Access•Luke Munn•AI and Ethics•2023

  • The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

    Open Access•Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca et al.•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society

    Open Access•Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls et al.•Minds and Machines•2018

  • Defending explicability as a principle for the ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine

    Open Access•Jonathan Adams•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2023

  • Principlism, Uncodifiability, and the Problem of Specification

    Open Access•Sophie Chevalier, Timothy J Furlan et al.•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2024

  • Common and Uncommon Moralities in Bioethics

    Open Access•Matti Häyry, Tuija Takala•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2022

  • Explicability of artificial intelligence in radiology

    Open Access•Frank Ursin, Cristian Timmermann et al.•Bioethics•2022

  • Conceptual Engineering and Philosophy of Technology

    Open Access•Jeroen Hopster, Guido Löhr•Philosophy & Technology•2023

  • Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Filippo Santoni de Sio, Giulio Mecacci•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • Double-Aspect Foundherentism

    Susan Haack•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1993

  • The normative significance of future moral revolutions

    Open Access•John Danaher, Jeroen Hopster•Futures•2022

  • Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies

    Open Access•Lorina Buhr, I R van de Poel et al.•Ethics of Socially Disruptive…•2023

  • Moral progress

    Open Access•Heinrich Sauer, Charlie Blunden et al.•Philosophy Compass•2021

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae