Patient confidentiality, the duty to protect, and psychotherapeutic care

Perspectives from the philosophy of ubuntu

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21702393
AutoresG W Bowersock (autor de correspondencia), Cornelius Ewuoso (0000-0001-7219-5554)
Año2021
Volumen42
Número1-2
Páginas41-59
Fecha de publicación2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMetamedicine (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0166-2031 • E-ISSN: 1573-1200
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0
OpenAlexW34523034
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas27

This paper demonstrates how ubuntu relational philosophy may be used to ground beneficial coercive care without necessarily violating a patient's dignity. Specifically, it argues that ubuntu philosophy is a useful theory for developing necessary conditions for determining a patient's potential dangerousness; setting reasonable limits to the duty to protect; balancing the long-term good of providing unimpeded therapy for patients who need it with the short-term good of protecting at-risk parties; and advancing a framework for future case law and appropriate regulations in the care of psychotherapy patients. Issues regarding the decision to breach medical confidentiality in psychotherapeutic care are ultimately reserved for the courts. Professional assessment might be an important first step in this process, and court rulings govern most aspects of this assessment. However, current case law, especially in the United States, places an unreasonable expectation on psychotherapists to protect all at-risk parties or foresee that a patient intends to follow through on said threats. It has largely failed to guarantee psychotherapy patients unlimited access to care, while potentially inhibiting future honest communication between patients and health professionals and endangering the safety of others. Of these decisions, the two most prominent are the 1976 Tarasoff decision and the 2016 Volk decision. This paper argues for the possibility of grounding good laws in ubuntu African philosophy in a way that protects others from harm and ensures unimpeded access to care without necessarily breaching medical confidentiality

Ancient history · Art · Byzantine architecture · Diplomacy · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Byzantine Studies and History · Classics · Global Maritime and Colonial Histories · History · Law