Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Public health measures and the rise of incidental surveillance

Considerations about private informational power and accountability

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21703405
AutoresBart A Kamphorst (0000-0002-7209-2210, Wageningen University & Research, autor de correspondencia), Adam Henschke (0000-0002-2956-0883, University of Twente)
Año2023
Volumen25
Número4
Fecha de publicación2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEthics and Information Technology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1388-1957 • E-ISSN: 1572-8439
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10676-023-09732-8
OpenAlexW4388733738
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas56

The public health measures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a substantially increased shared reliance on private infrastructure and digital services in areas such as healthcare, education, retail, and the workplace. This development has (i) granted a number of private actors significant (informational) power, and (ii) given rise to a range of digital surveillance practices incidental to the pandemic itself. In this paper, we reflect on these secondary consequences of the pandemic and observe that, even though collateral data disclosure and additional activity monitoring appears to have been generally socially accepted as inevitable consequences of the pandemic, part and parcel of a larger conglomeration of emergency compromises, these increased surveillance practices were not directly justified by appeals to solidarity and public health in the same way that the instigating public health measures were. Based on this observation, and given the increased reliance on private actors for maintaining the digital space, we argue that governments have a duty to (i) seek and ensure that there are justifications for collateral data disclosure and activity monitoring by private actors in the context of (future) public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, and (ii) regulate and provide accountability mechanisms for and oversight over these private surveillance practices on par with governmental essential services that engage in surveillance activities

Accountability · Business · Duty · Health care · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public relations · Solidarity · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

  • Digital recording and the hazards of unbounded moralized judgment

    Open Access•Bart A Kamphorst, Elizabeth O’neill•Technology in Society•2024

  • The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies

    Chrisanthi Avgerou, Robin Mansell et al.•Oxford Handbook of Information…•2009

  • Intelligence and the Function of Government

    Daniel Baldino, Rhys Crawley•Intelligence and the Function of…•2018

  • Counter-Terrorism, Ethics and Technology

    Open Access•Adam Henschke, Alastair Reed et al.•Counter-Terrorism, Ethics and…•2021

  • The use of mobile phone data to inform analysis of Covid-19 pandemic epidemiology

    Open Access•Kyra H Grantz, Hannah R Meredith et al.•Nature Communications•2020

  • Society-in-the-loop

    Open Access•Iyad Rahwan•Ethics and Information Technology•2018

  • Covid-19 transforms health care through telemedicine

    Open Access•David Mann, Devin M Mann et al.•Journal of the American Medical…•2020

  • Analysing and Assessing Accountability

    Open Access•Mark Bovens•European Law Journal•2007

  • Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations

    Open Access•Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers et al.•Science•2019

  • Explanation and Justification in Political Philosophy

    Alan Nelson•Ethics•1986

  • Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech’s newfound role as global health policy makers

    Open Access•Tamar Sharon•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data

    Open Access•Eugenijus Gefenas, Jūratė Lekstutienė et al.•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2022

  • Chatbot breakthrough in the 2020s? An ethical reflection on the trend of automated consultations in health care

    Open Access•Jaana Parviainen, Juho Rantala•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2022

  • Of intelligence oversight and the challenge of surveillance corporatism

    Peter Gill•Intelligence & National Security•2020

  • Digital technology use during Covid ‐19 pandemic

    Open Access•Deedra Vargo, Lin Zhu et al.•Human Behavior and Emerging…•2021

  • AI, big data, and the future of consent

    Open Access•Adam J Andreotta, Nin Kirkham et al.•AI & Society•2022

  • Digital wormholes

    Open Access•Elizabeth O’neill•AI & Society•2023

  • Bias and Discrimination in AI

    Open Access•Xavier Ferrer, Tom Van Nuenen et al.•IEEE Technology and Society…•2021

  • Ethics in an Age of Surveillance

    Open Access•Adam Henschke•Ethics in an Age of Surveillance•2017

  • The digital person

    Daniel J Solove•Choice Reviews Online•2005

  • Privacy in Context

    Helen Nissenbaum•Privacy in Context•2009

  • Good Proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies

    Open Access•Simon Coghlan, I K Burtseva et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change

    Open Access•Elizabeth O’neill•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • The ethics and value of contact tracing apps

    Open Access•Claudia Pagliari•Journal of Global Health•2020

  • Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during Covid-19

    Open Access•Christine Ipsen, Marc Van Veldhoven et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Conceptualizing Corporate Accountability in International Law

    Open Access•Nadia Bernaz•Human Rights Review•2020

  • The Value of Transparency

    Open Access•Scott Robbins, Adam Henschke•Surveillance & Society•2017

  • Beyond contact-tracing

    Open Access•Paolo Gerli, Emmanuel Ogiemwonyi Arakpogun et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Everybody Needs to Do Their Part, So We Can Get This Under Control.” Reactions to the Norwegian Government Meta‐Narratives on Covid‐19 Measures

    Open Access•Sigrun Marie Mo, Sigrun Marie Moss et al.•Political Psychology•2021

  • [email protected] Revisited

    Jason P Abbott, Jason Abbott•Third World Quarterly•2012

  • High-stakes crisis management in the Low Countries

    Open Access•Valérie Pattyn, Joery Matthys et al.•International Review of…•2021

  • Soft power

    Joseph S Nye•Soft power•2004

  • Overseeing Oversight

    Open Access•Morris S Ogul, Bert A Rockman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Is ‘Power’ Essentially Contested

    Open Access•K I Macdonald•British Journal of Political…•1976

  • Regulatory Choice for Alternative Modes of Regulation

    Open Access•Florian Saurwein•Law & Policy•2011

  • Security That Matters

    Open Access•Claudia Aradau•Security Dialogue•2010

  • Soft Power

    Open Access•Barry M Blechman•Political Science Quarterly•2004

  • Angry Enough to Riot

    Open Access•Jeffrey K Riley•Social Media + Society•2022

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae