Public health measures and the rise of incidental surveillance
Considerations about private informational power and accountability
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21703405 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bart A Kamphorst (0000-0002-7209-2210, Wageningen University & Research, autor de correspondencia), Adam Henschke (0000-0002-2956-0883, University of Twente) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 25 |
| Número | 4 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ethics and Information Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1388-1957 • E-ISSN: 1572-8439 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10676-023-09732-8 |
| OpenAlex | W4388733738 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 56 |
The public health measures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a substantially increased shared reliance on private infrastructure and digital services in areas such as healthcare, education, retail, and the workplace. This development has (i) granted a number of private actors significant (informational) power, and (ii) given rise to a range of digital surveillance practices incidental to the pandemic itself. In this paper, we reflect on these secondary consequences of the pandemic and observe that, even though collateral data disclosure and additional activity monitoring appears to have been generally socially accepted as inevitable consequences of the pandemic, part and parcel of a larger conglomeration of emergency compromises, these increased surveillance practices were not directly justified by appeals to solidarity and public health in the same way that the instigating public health measures were. Based on this observation, and given the increased reliance on private actors for maintaining the digital space, we argue that governments have a duty to (i) seek and ensure that there are justifications for collateral data disclosure and activity monitoring by private actors in the context of (future) public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, and (ii) regulate and provide accountability mechanisms for and oversight over these private surveillance practices on par with governmental essential services that engage in surveillance activities
Accountability · Business · Duty · Health care · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public relations · Solidarity · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies
Intelligence and the Function of Government
Counter-Terrorism, Ethics and Technology
The use of mobile phone data to inform analysis of Covid-19 pandemic epidemiology
Society-in-the-loop
Covid-19 transforms health care through telemedicine
Analysing and Assessing Accountability
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Explanation and Justification in Political Philosophy
Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech’s newfound role as global health policy makers
Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data
Chatbot breakthrough in the 2020s? An ethical reflection on the trend of automated consultations in health care
Of intelligence oversight and the challenge of surveillance corporatism
Digital technology use during Covid ‐19 pandemic
AI, big data, and the future of consent
Digital wormholes
Bias and Discrimination in AI
Ethics in an Age of Surveillance
The digital person
Privacy in Context
Good Proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies
Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change
The ethics and value of contact tracing apps
Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during Covid-19
Conceptualizing Corporate Accountability in International Law
The Value of Transparency
Beyond contact-tracing
Everybody Needs to Do Their Part, So We Can Get This Under Control.” Reactions to the Norwegian Government Meta‐Narratives on Covid‐19 Measures
[email protected] Revisited
High-stakes crisis management in the Low Countries
Soft power
Overseeing Oversight
Is ‘Power’ Essentially Contested
Regulatory Choice for Alternative Modes of Regulation
Security That Matters
Soft Power
Angry Enough to Riot
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |