Feminism for the 99% or Solidarity in the House of Difference? Intersectionality and Social Reproduction Theory
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21714650 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Abibi Stewart (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 30 |
| Número | 2-2021 |
| Páginas | 23-35 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-12-14 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | FEMINA POLITICA – Zeitschrift für feministische Politikwissenschaft (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1433-6359 • E-ISSN: 2196-1646 |
| Editorial | Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3224/feminapolitica.v30i2.03 |
| OpenAlex | W4200428544 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
Intersectionality is often understood to exist primarily as a corrective to other emancipatory theories rather than as a theory in its own right. Social reproduction theory (SRT), a strain of Marxist feminism exemplified in this article by contributors to the volume Social Reproduction Theory – Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression published in 2017, is characterized by a self-understanding that involves incorporating intersectional insights as a reaction to Black feminist interventions. In this narrative, intersectionality itself becomes obsolete, serving first and foremost as a step on SRT’s dialectical journey to becoming a better theory. Allegedly undertheorized intersectional frameworks constitute an ever-present foil for SRT’s self-image as an emancipatory theory of the capitalist social whole. This narrative is problematized on multiple levels in this article. SRT and its depiction of intersectionality are summarized in the first part of the paper. The second part demonstrates, on the one hand, that a historicization of intersectionality as ‘intervening’ into Marxist feminist theories, adding an intersectional perspective to feminist analysis of capitalism, ignores the formative role of analyses of Black women’s position as working subjects within overarching capitalist structures in intersectional thought. On the other hand, SRT's narrative occludes practical and theoretical implications of a framework that explicitly theorizes resistance from the margins. Building on this critique of SRT’s understanding of intersectionality, the third part develops an intersectional notion of solidarity, thus showing that the ostensibly seamless integration of intersectional insights into SRT obfuscates a potentially fruitful tension between the two frameworks pertaining to their respective understandings of solidarity and social transformation
Epistemology · Feminism · Feminist theory · Intersectionality · Marxist philosophy · Narrative · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Law · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
| Citas por año | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2027 (4) |
| Altamente citado | No |