The Coproduction illusion
Considering the relative success rates and efficiency rates of securing an Education, Health and Care plan when requested by families or education professionals
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21723123 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Adam Boddison (0000-0002-3509-310X, National Association for Special Educational Needs University of Wolverhampton, autor de correspondencia), Sue Soan (0000-0002-4934-343X, Canterbury Christ Church University) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 91-104 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-04-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1471-3802 • E-ISSN: 1471-3802 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-3802.12545 |
| OpenAlex | W3204760886 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
This comparative study examines success and efficiency rates for Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessments in England when requested by families or education professionals. England is the only nation in the UK with EHC needs assessments. These are requested from the Local Authority (LA) if the school’s ordinarily‐available provision is insufficient for individuals to make expected progress. Policy states that needs assessments should include parents, pupils and professionals in all decision making (coproduction). After a needs assessment, the LA may issue an EHC plan. This study considers whether the outcome of a needs assessment (issuing an EHC plan) is independent of the source of the request. Statistical analysis compared outcomes of needs assessments requested by families and education professionals. Analysis of publicly‐available datasets and policy provided further context. Findings included: (i) a need for further research to explore inconsistencies in outcomes of needs assessments across England; (ii) LAs efficient at issuing EHC plans were consistently efficient for requests from education professionals and families; (iii) a potential discrepancy between families’ perceived level of involvement and the reality: a ‘coproduction illusion’. It is proposed that policy and guidance in England requires revision to ensure consistent use of language, roles, and responsibilities
CARE Act · Coproduction · Health care · Health professionals · Medical education · Needs assessment · Political science · Public relations · Family and Disability Support Research · Homelessness and Social Issues · Medicine · Nursing · Parental Involvement in Education · Psychology
‘It's the best job in the world, but one of the hardest, loneliest, most misunderstood roles in a school.’ Understanding the complexity of the Senco role post‐Send reform
Developing Multiprofessional Teamwork for Integrated Children's Services
Facilitating coproduction
Learning how to be (a) patient
A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Types of Parental Involvement Programs for Urban Students
Freedom of Information Act
Alternatives for Delivering Public Services
| Citas por año | 2 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Altamente citado | No |