However and other transitions in the Han CH-EN corpus
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21726289 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Chao Han (0009-0007-9698-759X, Lanzhou University), Sheena Gardner (0000-0003-1924-5270, Coventry University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 51 |
| Páginas | 100984 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of English for Academic Purposes (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1475-1585 • E-ISSN: 1878-1497 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100984 |
| OpenAlex | W3135146341 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
Research on the frequency of transitions, or transition markers, has led to contested claims. Comparisons by L1 speaker (e.g. Leedham, 2015; Lei, 2012) argue that Chinese writers overuse and underuse certain transitions when compared to L1 English writers. Moreover, Biber et al. (1999) suggest transitions are frequent in technical scientific writing, while Hyland (2005) suggests they are more frequent in the discursive writing of the soft disciplines. Our study contributes to both these areas with evidence from a contrastive analysis of transition use by Chinese and English writers in the Han CH-EN corpus, a closely matched corpus of successful university student writing in English. A frequency comparison of transition use by Chinese and English writers finds no significant difference for most transitions. The transition used most often by both groups is however, which is examined across contexts. English writers use however significantly more than Chinese writers, but only in a small number of disciplines, genres and sentence positions. An examination of the literacy practices in these contexts suggests that terms such as ‘overuse’ and ‘underuse’ with their negative connotations should only be used when frequency data is combined with investigations of appropriate use in context
Linguistics · Literacy · Pedagogy · Sentence · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Second Language Learning and Teaching
Transition markers in Qatari university students' argumentative writing
A multi-corpus approach to the placement of however
Technical report writing as a pedagogic genre
“How can I add an argument appropriately in English?” Addition markers in Chinese L1 and English L1 university student writing
The developmental trajectory of contrast markers in children’s writing across four grade levels
University Language
Cohesion in English
Longman grammar of spoken and written English
Measurements of Development in L2 Written Production
A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing
Transition markers in EAP textbooks
Working with discourse
Interactive metadiscourse in research articles
Metadiscourse
Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,25 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |