Teacher- Versus AI-Generated (Poe Application) Corrective Feedback and Language Learners’ Writing Anxiety, Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21729344 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dan Wang (0000-0001-8174-0024, East China University of Political Science and Law, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 25 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 37-56 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-08-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1492-3831 • E-ISSN: 1492-3831 |
| Editorial | Athabasca University Press (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7646 |
| OpenAlex | W4401873351 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 21 |
| Referencias citadas | 21 |
This study examines the effects of corrective feedback (CF) on language learners’ writing anxiety, writing complexity, fluency, and accuracy, and compares the effectiveness of feedback from human teachers with an AI-driven application called Poe. The study included three intact classes, each with 25 language learners. Using a quasi-experimental design with pretest and posttest measures, one class received feedback from the teacher, one from the Poe application, and the third received no response to their writing. Data were generated though tests and a writing anxiety scale developed for the study. Data analysis, conducted using one-way ANOVA tests, revealed significant effects of teacher and AI-generated feedback on learners’ writing anxiety, accuracy, and fluency. Interestingly, the group that received AI-generated feedback performed better than the group that received teacher feedback or no AI support. Additionally, learners in the AI-generated feedback group experienced a more significant reduction in writing anxiety than their peers. These results highlight the remarkable impact of AI-generated CF on improving writing outcomes and alleviating anxiety in undergraduate language learners at East China University of Political Science and Law . The study demonstrates the benefits of integrating AI applications into language learning contexts, particularly by promoting a supportive environment for students to develop writing skills. Educators, researchers, and developers can use these findings to inform pedagogical practices and technological interventions to optimize the language learning experience in primary school settings. This research highlights the effectiveness of AI-driven applications in language teaching. It highlights the importance of considering learners’ psychological well-being, particularly anxiety levels, when developing effective language learning interventions
Anxiety · Cognitive psychology · Computer-Assisted Instruction · Computer-mediated communication · Corrective Feedback · Fluency · Language acquisition · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Second language · Second language writing · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Educational Technology and Pedagogy · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology
Students’ readiness for digital technology and perceptions of GenAI versus teacher feedback in interpreting training
Navigating the emotional journey of writing feedback
Cultivating Empathy in the Age of AI
Exploring the Impact of Generative AI-Powered Conversational Agents on Student Learning
The Effects of Artificial Intelligence-Based Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback on Second Language Writing and User Sentiment
AI-driven language learning in higher education
Epistemic authority and generative AI in learning spaces
Personalized language learning with an LLM chatbot
The impact of EFL learners’ perceived teacher emotions on learning engagement
Mapping the landscape of AI-driven feedback in education
Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices
The promise and limits of artificial intelligence in writing assessment and instruction
Learner perceptions of AI-generated feedback on L2 speaking in the ESP context
AI ‐Facilitated Article Revisions for Primary School Students With Writing Difficulties
Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on English language teaching
Customising chatbots for writing development
Can GenAI-empowered feedback promote L2 learners’ self-regulation strategic behavior and writing performance
Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback
Feedback encounters in doctoral supervision
A systematic review of AI-based feedback in educational settings
Reducing anxiety, promoting enjoyment and enhancing overall English proficiency
Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education
Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom
The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy
Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development
A typology of written corrective feedback types
Input, Interaction, and Second‐language Acquisition
Conceptualizing AI literacy
Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing
What if the devil is my guardian angel
Making Sense of the Digital Automation of Education
The quality assurance of a national English writing assessment
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators
The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres
Task‐based language teaching
Outcome measure of L2 writing as a mediator of the effects of corrective feedback on students' ability to write accurately
The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development
Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System
Feedback on second language students' writing
Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback in Developmental Multilingual Writing Classes
The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class
| Obras citantes distintas | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 21 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 21 |