Ritual Power

Risk, Rumours and Religious Pluralism on Lombok

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2174875
AutoresKari Telles, Kari Telle (Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2016
Volumen17
Número5
Páginas419-438
Fecha de publicación2016-10-19
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCanberra Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0314-9099 • E-ISSN: 1740-9314
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14442213.2016.1206614
OpenAlexW2538940258
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas43

This article shows how rituals occupy a key role in the negotiation of inter-religious relations on the island of Lombok. Building on the argument set out in Howe’s 2000 article on ‘Risk, Ritual and Performance’ in the Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute that the anthropology of ritual has much to gain by focusing on risk, this article takes the rhetorical evocation of risk as a focus of inquiry, thereby refining understandings of how ritual efficacy are discursively generated. Examining a contested Hindu ritual performed in 2007, the article traces the representations of risk being mobilised by three sets of actors with stakes in the performance, showing how the ritual was a compromise co-produced by the Hindu Balinese organisers, Sasak Muslim groups and government officials. The article also uses this controversy to illustrate that Balinese and Sasak, despite adhering to different religions, share key assumptions about the power of ritual

Argument (complex analysis) · Art · Compromise · Epistemology · Hinduism · Literature · Negotiation · Pluralism (philosophy) · Power (physics) · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Asian Studies and History · Philosophy · Religious studies · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies