A Bildung theoretical framework for Models-based Practice in physical education
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21783802 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kenneth Aggerholm (0000-0002-1315-6325, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Mats Melvold Hordvik (0000-0002-5694-1964, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Páginas | 1-13 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1740-8989 • E-ISSN: 1742-5786 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17408989.2024.2446787 |
| OpenAlex | W4405941185 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 20 |
Background: Models-based Practice (MbP) has gained popularity in the literature on physical education. It offers a comprehensive approach to teaching and programme planning. However, MbP lacks a solid theoretical foundation to guide reflections on educational purposes, teaching methods and learning aspirations.Purpose: This paper proposes a framework to address this shortcoming by drawing on Wolfgang Klafki's theory of general Bildung. The goal is to provide a theoretical foundation for MbP and contribute to its further development. By exploring the potential of a Bildung theoretical framework for MbP, this paper also seeks to bridge the gap between the Anglo-American tradition that MbP adheres to and the Continental tradition of Bildung.Relevance and Implications: The analysis demonstrates how Bildung theory can complement and challenge elements in MbP. First, it can contribute with an overarching educational purpose, which is to develop the capacity for self-determination, co-determination, and solidarity. Second, the principle of exemplarity can secure alignment between the main themes of models and epochal key problems. Third, the principles of non-affirmativity and versatility can inform learning aspirations for students, and the principle of multidimensionality can inform a multi-model approach where students engage with different body-cultural practices. Fourth, the principles of autonomy and interdependency can inform the pedagogical work of teachers.Conclusion: We conclude that, on the one hand, MbP can serve as a framework for integrating the educational principles of Bildung in schools, enriching the pedagogical landscape of physical education. On the other hand, Bildung theory can provide a solid theoretical framework for MbP, as it underpins several strengths of the approach and can guide its future development. Thus, MbP can provide a practical framework for working with general Bildung in physical education, while Bildung theory can provide a theoretical framework with criteria for the development and use of pedagogical models in MbP that align with democratic and educational objectives
Bildung · Epistemology · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Physical education · Sociology · Computer Science · Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport · Philosophy · Physical Education and Pedagogy · Psychology · Sports and Physical Education Studies
Bridging Educational Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik
Instructional Models in Physical Education
Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education
Versatility and pedagogical models in physical education
Between hope and happening
‘What we have done now is more student-centred’
Restrained Teaching
The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport
Educational Value and Models-Based Practice in Physical Education
Teaching, Teacher Education, and the Humanities
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |