Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Bringing the Reading Sciences Into the Classroom

Insights for Phonics Instruction

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21786090
AutoresTobias Ungerer (0000-0002-6879-7584, University of Toronto, autor de correspondencia), Kathleen Rastle (0000-0002-3070-7555, Royal Holloway University of London), Blair C Armstrong (0000-0002-6345-0389, University of Toronto)
Año2026
Páginas17456916261438004-17456916261438004
Fecha de publicación2026-05-05
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPerspectives on Psychological Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1745-6916 • E-ISSN: 1745-6924
EditorialSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17456916261438004
PMID42085600
OpenAlexW7160243483
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas148

Teaching phonics—that is, systematic mappings between letters and sounds—plays a foundational role in how children learn to read in alphabetical writing systems. Although the reading sciences yield important insights into the factors underlying effective phonics instruction, these findings have not been sufficiently linked to key decisions that teachers must make in the classroom—for instance, which spelling-sound regularities to teach, in what order to introduce them, how to illustrate them with example words, and when to teach exception words. We first show that existing phonics programs provide varying guidance on these aspects, which may affect learning outcomes in ways that are poorly understood. We then discuss how research on reading and learning can inform key considerations regarding the use of effective phonics content. We also highlight gaps in current knowledge that remain to be addressed by further work. Finally, we outline a road map for how future research could support the design and selection of optimized phonics content, thus benefiting the professional practice of diverse stakeholders in education

Learning to read · Phonics · Teaching method · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Reading and Literacy Development · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • Pisa 2022 Results (Volume I)

    OECD OECD•Pisa 2022 Results (Volume I)•2023

  • Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading

    Michael W Harm, Mark S Seidenberg•Psychological Review•2004

  • Adolescent health literacy and health behaviors

    Open Access•Sasha A Fleary, Patrece Joseph et al.•Journal of Adolescence•2018

  • Moving beyond Coltheart’s N

    Open Access•Tal Yarkoni, David A Balota et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2008

  • PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading

    Ina V S Mullis, Ina Mullis et al.•2023

  • A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

    F Gregory Ashby, Leola A Alfonso-Reese et al.•Psychological Review•1998

  • Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories

    Conrad Perry, Johannes C Ziegler et al.•Psychological Review•2007

  • Ending the Reading Wars

    Open Access•Anne Castles, Kathleen Rastle et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2018

  • Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read

    Open Access•Linnea C Ehri, Simone R Nunes et al.•Review of Educational Research•2001

  • DRC

    Max Coltheart, Kathleen Rastle et al.•Psychological Review•2001

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Long-Term Effects of Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension Interventions

    Open Access•Sebastian P Suggate•Journal of Learning Disabilities•2016

  • Chapter 4 The Reading Process is Different for Different Orthographies

    Leonard Katz, Ram Frost•Orthography, phonology,…•1992

  • A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

    Mark S Seidenberg, James L Mcclelland•Psychological Review•1989

  • Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning

    Open Access•Gwyneth C Rost, Bob Mcmurray•Developmental Science•2009

  • Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work

    Paul A Kirschner, John Sweller et al.•Educational Psychologist•2006

  • Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design

    Open Access•John Sweller, Jeroen J G Van Merriënboer et al.•Educational Psychology Review•1998

  • Reconciling category exceptions through representational shifts

    Open Access•Yongzhen Xie, Michael L Mack•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2024

  • Can explicit instruction boost statistical learning? A meta-analytical review

    Jinglei Ren, Min Wang et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2024

  • The relationships between oral language and reading instruction

    Open Access•Ya-Ning Chang, Ya‐Ning Chang et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2020

  • Leisure Reading (But Not Any Kind) and Reading Comprehension Support Each Other—A Longitudinal Study Across Grades 1 and 9

    Open Access•Minna Torppa, Pekka Niemi et al.•Child Development•2020

  • Unraveling the Relation Between Reading Comprehension and Print Exposure

    Open Access•Florina Erbeli, Elsje Van Bergen et al.•Child Development•2020

  • Acquisition of cognitive skill

    Jared R Anderson, John R Anderson•Psychological Review•1982

  • An investigation of factors associated with letter-sound knowledge at kindergarten entry

    Francis L Huang, Laura S Tortorelli et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2014

  • Children’s knowledge of single- and multiple-letter grapheme-phoneme correspondences

    Open Access•Laragh Larsen, Stefan K Schauber et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2020

  • English as a medium of instruction in postcolonial contexts

    Lizzi O Milligan, Leon Tikly•Comparative Education•2016

  • Matthew Effects in Reading

    Open Access•Keith E Stanovich•Reading Research Quarterly•1986

  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Structured Word Inquiry for Students in Grades 3 and 5 With Reading and Spelling Difficulties

    Open Access•Danielle Colenbrander, Liam Parsons et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2022

  • What Constitutes a Science of Reading Instruction

    Open Access•Timothy Shanahan•Reading Research Quarterly•2020

  • How Are Practice and Performance Related? Development of Reading From Age 5 to 15

    Open Access•Elsje Van Bergen, Kati Vasalampi et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2021

  • Translational Science

    Open Access•Emily J Solari, Nicole Patton Terry et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2020

  • Learning Letters

    Open Access•Theresa A Roberts•Reading Research Quarterly•2021

  • The Science of Reading Progresses

    Open Access•Nell K Duke, Kelly B Cartwright•Reading Research Quarterly•2021

  • Critically Reviewing GraphoGame Across the World

    Open Access•Erin M McTigue, Oddny Judith Solheim et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2020

  • Bringing the Science of Reading to Preservice Elementary Teachers

    Open Access•Annemarie Hindman, Annemarie H Hindman et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2020

  • How the Science of Reading Informs 21st‐Century Education

    Open Access•Yaacov Petscher, Sonia Q Cabell et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2020

  • Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice

    Open Access•Mark S Seidenberg, Matt Cooper Borkenhagen et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2020

  • Statistical learning in reading

    Keith S Apfelbaum, Eliot Hazeltine et al.•Developmental Psychology•2013

  • Investigating the role of context in learning to read

    Open Access•Nicola Archer, Peter Bryant•British Journal of Psychology•2001

  • Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies

    Open Access•Philip H K Seymour, Mikko Aro et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2003

  • Children's printed word database

    Open Access•John Masterson, Jackie Masterson et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2010

  • Inadequate foundational decoding skills constrain global literacy goals for pupils in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Michael Crawford, Michael J Crawford et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2024

  • On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice

    David L Share•Psychological Bulletin•2008

  • Reading Acquisition, Developmental Dyslexia, and Skilled Reading Across Languages

    Johannes C Ziegler, Upasana Goswami et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2005

  • The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills

    Richard K Wagner, Joseph K Torgesen•Psychological Bulletin•1987

  • Similarity matters

    Matthias Brunmair, Tobias Richter•Psychological Bulletin•2019

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae