Passive data collection on Reddit
A practical approach
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21787667 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tiago Rocha Silva (0000-0003-3564-4423, Universidade do Porto, autor de correspondencia), Maria Da Conceição De Oliveira Carvalho Nogueira (0000-0002-9152-754X, Universidade do Porto), Liliana Rodrigues (0000-0001-6900-9634, Universidade do Porto) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 20 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 453-470 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Research Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/17470161231210542 |
| OpenAlex | W4389091888 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 33 |
Since its onset, scholars have characterized social media as a valuable source for data collection since it presents several benefits (e.g. exploring research questions with hard-to-reach populations). Nonetheless, methods of online data collection are riddled with ethical and methodological challenges that researchers must consider if they want to adopt good practices when collecting and analyzing online data. Drawing from our primary research project, where we collected passive online data on Reddit, we explore and detail the steps that researchers must consider before collecting online data: (1) planning online data collection; (2) ethical considerations; and (3) data collection. We also discuss two atypical questions that researchers should also consider: (1) how to handle deleted user-generated content; and (2) how to quote user-generated content. Moving on from the dichotomous discussion between what is public and private data, we present recommendations for good practices when collecting and analyzing qualitative online data
Data collection · Data science · Engineering ethics · Ethical issues · Internet privacy · Qualitative property · Social media · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Engineering · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics
A netnography of WWE fans grappling with AI storytelling on streaming platforms
A hidden population
They Want to Be the Only One to Shine
Understanding haze data contestations in Singapore
Online Discussions About Intrauterine Devices
Perspectives on Non-consensual Deepfake Pornography
Experiences with AI-Generated Pornography
Self-Diagnosis of Mental Disorders
The Ethics of Using the Internet to Collect Qualitative Research Data
The Pushshift Reddit Dataset
Do Student Samples Provide an Accurate Estimate of the General Public?
Amazon's Mechanical Turk
Reddit Users' Experiences of Suicidal Thoughts During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Ethical and privacy considerations for research using online fandom data
Ethical approval
Reporting and discoverability of “Tweets” quoted in published scholarship
“Punched in the Balls”
Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research
“But the data is already public”
Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting
Covid-19 vaccine perceptions in the initial phases of US vaccine roll-out
What Is “Publicly Available Data”? Exploring Blurred Public–Private Boundaries and Ethical Practices Through a Case Study on Instagram
Gaming the gift
Snooping and Sexting
New Data Sources in Social Science Research
Fast, Free, and Targeted
Studying Reddit
What You Can Scrape and What Is Right to Scrape
A Guide to Conducting Online Focus Groups via Reddit
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |