Digital transformation and gender justice

A paradoxical regime of persistent inequalities

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21795643
AutoresRosa Monteiro (0000-0002-2429-5590, University of Coimbra, autor de correspondencia), Ernesto Nieto-Carrillo (0000-0002-3345-9008, University of Coimbra), Mariana Matias Santos (0000-0002-4539-4707, University of Coimbra)
Año2026
Páginas1-19
Fecha de publicación2026-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1758-8871 • E-ISSN: 1477-996X
EditorialEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/jices-01-2026-0024
OpenAlexW7166576852
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas21

Purpose This paper critically analyses Portuguese public policies for gender equality in the digital sphere (2017-2025) and documents gender inequality trends in the sector, as crucial ethical and societal dimensions of technologies. This paper aims to analyse the initial integration and later weakening of gender equality in digital transformation policies. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a mixed-methods design, drawing on empirical evidence from the project Women4Digital − Gender Equality in the Digital Transition in Portugal: what place for Women? It combines systematic mapping and qualitative document analysis of policy frameworks with a quantitative analysis of gender inequalities trends in ICT employment, based on administrative linked employer-employee data set (2007-2023), and qualitative data gathered from two focus groups. Findings Quantitative evidence confirms sizeable structural inequalities: women represent only around 21% of employment in ICT occupations, are markedly underrepresented in executive roles, and face more precarious working conditions. Policy cycles (2017-2025) peaked in 2021 by embedding EU funding conditionalities for structural change, followed by an institutional slowdown characterised by a shift back towards reinforcing symbolic “fix the women” approaches. Critical governance gaps persist: major investments are gender-blind, and new regulatory regimes risk undermining ethical enforcement against gendered online harms. Originality/value By framing digital regulation as a gendered institutional site, this paper brings feminist policy analysis into direct dialogue with digital ethics. It provides an original, longitudinal account of gender inequality trends that distinguishes ICT occupations from ICT-sector firms, while interrogating whether EU-driven digital governance architectures enable or constrain an inclusive, ethical and gender-just digital transformation. In doing so, it also shows how ethical and gender-blind design persists in fast-growing policy domains such as platform regulation, AI governance and cybersecurity

Corporate governance · Digital divide · Digital transformation · Enforcement · Inequality · Information and Communications Technology · Qualitative comparative analysis · Qualitative property · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Gender and Technology in Education