Missing the Big Picture
Platform Opacity Weaponized for Disinformation in the Twitter Files Brazil Case
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22009028 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carlos Edurado Barros (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Rose Marie Santini (0000-0003-0657-7217, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Thiago Ciodaro Xavier (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Felipe Grael (0000-0002-9261-379X, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Fernando Ferreira (0000-0002-7497-7688, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2162-3317 • E-ISSN: 2162-3317 |
| Editorial | University of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5210/spir.v2024i0.15063 |
| OpenAlex | W7133501590 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
This paper examines the implications of the Twitter Files Brazil (TFB) controversy for the debate on platform governance, focusing on issues of transparency, moderation, and sovereignty. How has the TFB case contributed to the political manipulation of platform governance and accountability? The study combines network analysis of posts from April 2024 and historical data to map accounts early flagged for coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB) and analyze the spread of disinformation on the platform. We also analysed the top shared posts to identify disinformation claims. Our findings reveal a polarized network, split into two distinct communities: one led by far-right U.S. and Brazilian far-right and the other by Brazilian progressive influencers. It highlights the role of far-right leaders in Brazil, who leveraged accusations against the Brazilian government to delegitimize national institutions, particularly the Supreme Court. 30.34% of the accounts engaged on sharings were previously flagged for CIB. We argue that these dynamics reflect a broader pattern of platform selective transparency, which contributes to weaponize opacity and undermine democratic digital governance. The lack of transparency hides that, beyond the legal requests for platform data and moderation, X actively arbitrates removals and boosts without accountability, including falsehoods driven by political propaganda. The study highlights how digital platforms, particularly in the Global South, play a crucial role in the international spread of disinformation, linking it to critiques of digital colonialism
Big data · Corporate governance · Disinformation · Internet governance · Politics · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |