Temporalities for, of, and in Planning
Exploring Post-Growth, Participation, and Devolution Across European Planning Reforms
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22018191 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lucia Cerrada Morato (0000-0002-5018-4042), Agnieszka Zimnicka (0000-0002-5847-1521), Judi Wilson |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 10 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-04-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Editorial | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.9121 |
| OpenAlex | W4409925389 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 35 |
In the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic and the acceleration of climate change, many governments are turning to their planning systems to explore how national planning reform can help them address their current crisis. Time across planning reforms appears as a central dimension, building on governments’ long-term ambitions to speed planning. While academic normative debates argue in favour of faster and/or slower changes to planning as inherently good or bad, this article draws on a comparative analysis of national planning reforms across three European countries to critically examine how time is being mobilised and with what objective. Through an analytical framework that seeks a more holistic understanding of the planning process, we argue that temporalities in planning are relational. Across the three cases, we can see how the generation of consensus depoliticises the use of time, and it is generally used to advance regressive agendas. We argue that despite ambitions to make planning more responsive and participatory at the local level, planning reforms (a) reduce the influence of public participation while strengthening private property rights; (b) are used to territorialise sectoral, top–down, and long-term agendas with no consideration of the timely and situated concerns and visions of residents and communities; and (c) are underpinned by a pro-growth and rapid urbanisation agenda that ignores sustainability debates
Archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · Regional science · Temporalities · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Public Administration · Rural development and sustainability · Urbanization and City Planning
Slow Planning?
State of Exception
European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation
Opportunities and Challenges of Municipal Planning in Shaping Vertical Neighbourhoods in Greater London
Advocacy planning
Collaborative planning? Not yet seen in Poland. Identifying procedural gaps in the planning system 2003–2023
Spatial planning systems in Europe
Informal practices in urban planning and governance. Examples from Polish cities
Suburban climate adaptation governance
Slow cities, urban politics and the temporalities of planning
Centring Housing in Political Economy
Sustainable de-growth
Planning for Growth
Introduction
Depoliticizing urban futures
British local authority planners, planning reform and everyday practices within the state
Time and community
Political Apologies and the Question of a 'Shared Time' in the Australian Context
Behind the Scaffolding
The time it takes
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |