Reframing the Nexus Between Forced Migration and Urban Resilience
Discussing Impacts on Urban Futures
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22018308 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Annegret Haase (0000-0002-8492-9161, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), J Pößneck (0000-0003-1599-4506, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-05-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Editorial | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.11760 |
| OpenAlex | W7161843143 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 25 |
The relationship between forced migration and urban resilience is an under‐researched topic within both the local resilience and migration discourses. While discussions tend to focus on institutional and psychological resilience, we argue that forced migration should be considered a systemic component of urban resilience and the future of cities. As resilience is currently understood in many different ways, even in contrasting ways, we contend that true resilience requires counteracting the pervasive “threat” of arrival and its criminalisation. There is a need to establish counter‐narratives that replace narratives of fear, hate, and division with narratives that uphold everyone’s human dignity. These narratives should emphasise what urban societies have in common and demonstrate how inclusion can shape urban futures. While there is no reason to romanticise the “productive moments” of disruptions induced by forced migration, these moments are crucial for learning how to navigate urban realities and futures in arrival and postmigrant societies. They are also indispensable for building societal resilience in times of crisis. Likewise, we need to be more aware of the risk of depoliticising the discourse on local resilience by viewing a “broad consensus” as a resilient solution—this tends to silence critical voices
Cognitive reframing · Forced migration · Futures contract · Narrative · Psychological resilience · Urbanization · Disaster Management and Resilience · Regional resilience and development · Resilience and Mental Health
Regression als Aufbruch
Resilience as Discourse
Housing refugees from Ukraine
Urban migration governance under the resilience lens
Moving beyond disruptive innovation
Re-Framing, De-Framing, and Shattering the Frames
Making a difference - The accommodation of refugees in Leipzig and Osnabrück
Integration of refugees in rural areas and the role of the receiving society
Discourses of solidarity fatigue as ambivalent recognition among German and Polish actors in relation to Ukrainian displacement
Refugee-Integration-Opportunity Structures
Resilience thinking meets social theory
Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why
The arrival of Ukrainian refugees as an opportunity to advance migrant integration policy
Citizenship Practices and Urban Governance in European Cities
Sustainability and Resilience in Migration Governance for a Post-pandemic World
Migration as Crisis
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |