Conceptualizing Testbed Planning

Urban Planning in the Intersection between Experimental and Public Sector Logics

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22018331
AutoresLina Berglund-Snodgrass (0000-0003-3003-0457, K2), Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren (0000-0002-0771-5821, T ra ns po rt Fo rs K)
Año2020
Volumen5
Número1
Páginas96-106
Fecha de publicación2020-03-13
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
EditorialCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v5i1.2528
OpenAlexW3011456837
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas34
Referencias citadas29

Urban planning is, in many countries, increasingly becoming intertwined with local climate ambitions, investments in urban attractiveness and “smart city” innovation measures. In the intersection between these trends, urban experimentation has developed as a process where actors are granted action space to test innovations in a collaborative setting. One arena for urban experimentation is urban testbeds. Testbeds are sites of urban development, in which experimentation constitutes an integral part of planning and developing the area. This article introduces the notion of testbed planning as a way to conceptualize planning processes in delimited sites where planning is combined with processes of urban experimentation. We define testbed planning as a multi-actor, collaborative planning process in a delimited area, with the ambition to generate and disseminate learning while simultaneously developing the site. The aim of this article is to explore processes of testbed planning with regard to the role of urban planners. Using an institutional logics perspective we conceptualize planners as navigating between a public sector—and an experimental logic. The public sector logic constitutes the formal structure of “traditional” urban planning, and the experimental logic a collaborative and testing governance structure. Using examples from three Nordic municipalities, this article explores planning roles in experiments with autonomous buses in testbeds. The analysis shows that planners negotiate these logics in three different ways, combining and merging them, separating and moving between them or acting within a conflictual process where the public sector logic dominates

Business · Civil engineering · Environmental design and planning · Environmental planning · Geography · Knowledge management · Land-use planning · Management science · Negotiation · Participatory planning · Political science · Process management · Public sector · Social science · Sociology · Spatial planning · Testbed · Transport engineering · Transportation planning · Urban planning · Computer Science · Engineering · Public Policy and Administration Research · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Urban Planning and Governance