The crisis of nuclear arms control
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22020104 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ulrich Kühn (0000-0001-6877-9098, Universität Hamburg, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 10 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 319-344 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2192-1741 • E-ISSN: 2524-6976 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s42597-022-00069-5 |
| OpenAlex | W4221113871 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 24 |
The politics of nuclear arms control between the United States and Russia are in a protracted state of crisis, which is in need of explanation. This article provides an overview of bilateral contractual milestones from 1972 to 2001 and analyzes instances of cooperation through the lens of three key factors that have influenced the process. It then considers the changes that these factors have undergone over twenty years of crisis in bilateral arms control from 2001 to 2021 and gauges the possible consequences of a continuation of the current situation. It concludes that during the first period, a shared willingness to shield the bilateral process from political disruption, U.S. bipartisan support, and cooperatively addressing the vertical diffusion of offensive and defensive missile capabilities were both possible and necessary for ensuring success. During the second period, these key factors underwent significant changes and ultimately had a negative effect on the bilateral process, which makes the current crisis unique compared to earlier episodes of regression. Most importantly, both sides were no longer willing to shield the bilateral process in its entirety during this period, including defensive and sub-strategic offensive elements. With a view to future consequences, these findings point to reduced arms race stability, weaker negotiated outcomes, and an erosion of the global nonproliferation regime
Arms control · Business · Economics · Management · Missile · Offensive · Operations management · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Engineering · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense
Brakeman or booster? Presidents, ideological polarization, reciprocity, and the politics of US arms control
Stability amid Strategic Deregulation
Putin, Putinism, and the Domestic Determinants of Russian Foreign Policy
Evolving Russian Perspectives on Missile Defense
Ditch the NPT
Mad Momentum Redux? The Rise and Fall of Nuclear Arms Control
Strategic Stability, Uncertainty and the Future of Arms Control
Periods of Peril
Power and Purpose
Why Arms Control
The End of Arms Control
Nuclear Disarmament without the Nuclear-Weapon States
Life beyond Arms Control
Russia, the west, and the Ukraine crisis
The Budapest Memorandum and Russia's intervention in Ukraine
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |