Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Machine-Learning/Artificial-Intelligence—facilitated satellite imagery analysis for trustworthy arms control verification

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22020122
AutoresSara Al-Sayed (0000-0002-7026-5413, Union of Concerned Scientists, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Fecha de publicación2026-04-14
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaZeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2192-1741 • E-ISSN: 2524-6976
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s42597-026-00160-1
OpenAlexW7154282570
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas22

With the unraveling of the arms control architecture and diminished prospects for nuclear weapons agreements between the U.S. and Russia and China, there are increased risks from worst-case assumptions, and opportunities to build mutual trust are eroding. In this context, satellite remote sensing is expected to become a vital tool for assessing nuclear forces and postures. Today’s satellite systems generate vast amounts of data that is accessible to both governments and civil society. Given the scale of data, machine learning (ML)/artificial intelligence (AI) play an increasingly central role in data fusion and analysis. However, for ML/AI-facilitated satellite imagery analysis to become a component of future arms control verification regimes that foster the requisite trust to put states on a course towards nuclear disarmament, it is necessary to conceptualize a role for such information collection and analysis mechanisms in an arms control process that is built on and promotes trust between its parties. Yet, challenges arise from the dispersed and heterogeneous nature of data sources and the diversity of actors involved, which may affect perceptions of trustworthiness. The article examines these issues through a practice-based account and trust analysis of an ML pipeline implementation of a missile silo classification task and draws lessons from the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty verification regime, where those challenges have also been encountered. The examination demonstrates that two factors have the most bearing on trust between states: the imbalance between states in technical capabilities and the susceptibility of the entailed verification arrangements to politicized claims around verification gaps

Arms control · Command and control · Satellite · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Space exploration and regulation

  • Trust in International Relations

    Open Access•Hiski Haukkala, Carina van de Wetering et al.•Trust in International Relations•2018

  • Trust as a Social Reality

    J D Lewis, Andrew Weigert et al.•Social Forces•1985

  • Going global

    Jan Ruzicka, Vincent Charles Keating•Journal of Trust Research•2015

  • The Nonproliferation Complex

    Open Access•Christina Craig, Campbell Craig et al.•Ethics & International Affairs•2013

  • Heralds of global transparency

    Open Access•Christopher Lawrence•Social Studies of Science•2019

  • Trusting relationships in international politics

    Open Access•Vincent Charles Keating, Jan Ruzicka•Review of International Studies•2014

  • Trust but verify

    Aaron Bateman•Journal of Strategic Studies•2023

  • Trust and confidence in regime creation and sustainment

    Open Access•Kjølv Egeland•Cooperation and Conflict•2024

  • Private Eyes in the Sky

    Open Access•Erik Lin-Greenberg, Theo Milonopoulos•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2021

  • A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations

    Open Access•Aaron M Hoffman•European Journal of International…•2002

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae