Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Daily Water Level Prediction of Zrebar Lake (Iran)

A Comparison between M5P, Random Forest, Random Tree and Reduced Error Pruning Trees Algorithms

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22034367
AutoresViet‐Ha Nhu (0000-0003-1812-950X, Ton Duc Thang University), Himan Shahabi (0000-0001-5091-6947, University of Kurdistan, autor de correspondencia), Ebrahim Nohani (0000-0002-2692-6253, Islamic Azad University, Dezful Branch), Ataollah Shirzadi (0000-0003-1666-1180, University of Kurdistan), Nadhir Al‐Ansari (0000-0002-6790-2653, Luleå University of Technology, autor de correspondencia), Sepideh Bahrami (0000-0003-2174-2145, University of Nevada, Reno), Shaghayegh Miraki (Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University), Marten Geertsema (0000-0002-4650-8251, Ministry of Forests), Hoang Nguyen (0009-0009-4941-4486, Duy Tan University)
Año2020
Volumen9
Número8
Páginas479
Fecha de publicación2020-07-31
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2220-9964 • E-ISSN: 2220-9964
EditorialMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/ijgi9080479
OpenAlexW3046048985
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas82

Zrebar Lake is one of the largest freshwater lakes in Iran and it plays an important role in the ecosystem of the environment, while its desiccation has a negative impact on the surrounded ecosystem. Despite this, this lake provides an interesting recreation setting in terms of ecotourism. The prediction and forecasting of the water level of the lake through simple but practical methods can provide a reliable tool for future lake water resource management. In the present study, we predict the daily water level of Zrebar Lake in Iran through well-known decision tree-based algorithms, including the M5 pruned (M5P), random forest (RF), random tree (RT) and reduced error pruning tree (REPT). We used five different water input combinations to find the most effective one. For our modeling, we chose 70% of the dataset for training (from 2011 to 2015) and 30% for model evaluation (from 2015 to 2017). We evaluated the models’ performances using different quantitative (root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R2), percent bias (PBIAS) and ratio of the root mean square error to the standard deviation of measured data (RSR)) and visual frameworks (Taylor diagram and box plot). Our results showed that water level with a one-day lag time had the highest effect on the result and, by increasing the lag time, its effect on the result was decreased. This result indicated that all the developed models had a good prediction capability, but the M5P model outperformed the others, followed by RF and RT equally and then REPT. Our results showed that these algorithms can predict water level accurately only with a one-day lag time in water level as an input and they are cost-effective tools for future predictions

Algorithm · Correlation coefficient · Decision tree · Machine learning · Mean squared error · Pruning · Random forest · Standard deviation · Statistics · Computer Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Mathematics

  • Unraveling urban bike-sharing dynamics

    Open Access•Kai-Fa Lu, Yanghe Liu et al.•Cities•2025

  • Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram

    Open Access•Karl E Taylor•Journal of Geophysical Research:…•2001

  • River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles

    Open Access•J E Nash, J V Sutcliffe•Journal of Hydrology•1970

  • Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations

    D N Moriasi D N Moriasi, Daniel N Moriasi et al.•Transactions of the ASABE•2007

  • Bagging predictors

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•1996

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae