Evaluating Differences in Mathematical Competencies in Middle School Students during Pandemic Conditions through Preparatec Platform
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22045178 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Blanca Estela Maldonado-García (0000-0003-4042-9349, Tecnológico de Monterrey), Alejandra Ocampo-Díaz (0000-0003-0569-2782, Tecnológico de Monterrey), May Portuguez Castro (0000-0001-7531-6956, Institute for the Future, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 546 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-08-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci12080546 |
| OpenAlex | W4291392416 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 31 |
This research proposes to evaluate the difference in essential mathematical competencies of middle school students transitioning to high school level under pandemic conditions (COVID-19) using the PreparaTec platform and Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) released items as an evaluation instrument. The study was conducted with 84 students from first semester high school at Prepa Tec (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Cuernavaca) aged 14 and 15. The students were divided into three experimental groups and a control group. Three levels of mathematical competencies: reproduction, definitions, and calculations (level 1), connections and integration to solve problems (level 2), and reflection (level 3) were evaluated. We applied a pre-test at the beginning of the semester and a post-test at the end after using the PreparaTec platform. Both tests were written and applied in a face-to-face format. The study presents the findings regarding the impact of using the PreparaTec platform during the first semester in the three levels of mathematical competencies mentioned. The results obtained are presented in two analyses. The first analysis involves the results obtained per experimental group and according to the number of correct answers per group. The second analysis represents a comparison between the percentage of correct answers and the level of difficulty per question per student regarding the percentage, determined by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Spain in the format presented by PISA. The pre-test and post-test consisted of 23 questions from items released from PISA, which contemplated measuring the three levels of mathematical competence. The results showed an improvement of 57% in level 1 proficiency questions, 63.6% in level 2 proficiency, and 100% in level 3 proficiency. The findings indicate that new teaching strategies based on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and more meaningful assessment forms further develop students’ mathematical competencies
Mathematics education · Medical education · Computer Science · Digital literacy in education · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Educational Innovations and Technology · Medicine · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
The flipped classroom
Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction
The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions
Pisa Achievement in Sweden From the Perspective of Both Individual Data and Aggregated Cross-Country Data
Understanding and Addressing the Deficiencies in UK Mathematics Education
Gamification as a Teaching Method to Improve Performance and Motivation in Tertiary Education during Covid-19
Students’ Mathematics Anxiety at Distance and In-Person Learning Conditions during Covid-19 Pandemic
Challenges and Opportunities of Mathematics in Digital Times
ICT Motivation in Sixth-Grade Students in Pandemic Times—The Influence of Gender and Age
Covid-19 as a catalyst for educational change
A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields
Provincializing the OECD-Pisa global competences project
The effects of upper‐secondary education and training systems on skills inequality. A quasi‐cohort analysis using Pisa 2000 and the OECD survey of adult skills
Blended learning
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |