Measuring Personalized Learning in the Smart Classroom Learning Environment
Development and Validation of an Instrument
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22047331 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Pan Tuo (Shaanxi Normal University), Mehmet Bıçakçı (0000-0001-6865-9328, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Albert Ziegler (0000-0002-2122-0673, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Baohui Zhang (0000-0002-2523-2049, Shaanxi Normal University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 620 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-05-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci15050620 |
| OpenAlex | W4410523711 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 70 |
Smart classrooms leverage intelligent and mobile technologies to create highly interactive, student-centered environments conducive to personalized learning. However, measuring students’ personalized learning experiences in these technologically advanced spaces remains a challenge. This study addresses the gap by developing and validating a Smart Classroom Environment–Personalized Learning Scale (SCE-PL). Drawing on a comprehensive literature review, content-expert feedback, and iterative item refinement, an initial pool of 48 items was reduced to 39 and subsequently to 34 following item-level analyses. Two datasets were collected from Chinese middle-school students across three provinces, capturing diverse socio-economic contexts and grade levels (7th, 8th, and 9th). EFA on the first dataset (n = 424) revealed a nine-factor structure collectively explaining 78.12% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the second dataset (n = 584) verified an excellent model fit. Internal consistency indices (Cronbach’s α > 0.87, composite reliability > 0.75) and strong convergent and discriminant validity evidence (based on AVE and inter-factor correlations) further support the scale’s psychometric soundness. The SCE-PL thus offers researchers, policymakers, and practitioners a robust, theory-driven instrument for assessing personalized learning experiences in smart classroom environments, paving the way for data-informed pedagogy, optimized learning spaces, and enhanced technological integration
Human–computer interaction · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Computer Science · Digital literacy in education · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology
Understanding the implementation of personalized learning
Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
The content validity index
Same Classroom, Different Reality
Developing and Validating a Scale for University Teacher’s Caring Behavior in Online Teaching
Awareness of Sustainable Development Goals among Students from a Chinese Senior High School
Appraising research on personalized learning
Personalized learning and Essa
Impact of smart classrooms combined with student-centered pedagogies on rural students’ learning outcomes
Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education
The effectiveness of technology‐supported personalised learning in low‐ and middle‐income countries
An overview of 25 years of research on digital personalised learning in primary and secondary education
Measuring personalized learning through the Lens of UDL
The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory
Smart classroom environments affect teacher-student interaction
Awareness Contexts and Social Interaction
The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect
Beyond Mead
Cognitive Skills and Noncognitive Traits and Behaviors in Stratification Processes
Sociological Implications of the Thought of George Herbert Mead
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |