Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Challenges to equitable access to urogenital care in urban and rural Kazakhstan

A mixed-methods study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22069887
AutoresNurgul Darmen (Kazakhstan Medical University), Г Е Аимбетова (0000-0002-9466-6297, Kazakh National Medical University), Gulshara Aimbetova (Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University), Maiya Zhakupova (0000-0002-1529-0018, Kazakh National Medical University), Akmaral Aitmanbetova (Kazakh National Medical University), A M Shakhiyeva (Kazakh National Medical University), Adilya Shakhiyeva (Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University), Yernur Zikiriya (0009-0000-1188-2545, Kazakhstan Medical University), Nurgul Alekenova (Kazakhstan Medical University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Volumen14
Páginas1813983-1813983
Fecha de publicación2026-04-22
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditorialFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1813983
PMID42100532
OpenAlexW7155196799
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas18

Background Addressing urban–rural inequalities is essential for universal health coverage. This study examined disparities in access to genitourinary (GU) care in Kazakhstan. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted in urban and rural areas of Almaty region (2024–2025). Quantitative data ( n = 721) were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression. Qualitative interviews with urologists ( n = 11) were thematically analyzed. Results Sex distribution was similar. Urban residents had higher education, while rural residents reported better financial status. Most sought initial care at PHC, though self-treatment was common. Rural residents relied more on PHC and had longer waiting times; urban residents more often used private services. Workforce shortages and limited diagnostic capacity were key barriers, especially in rural areas. Conclusion Urban–rural disparities in GU care hinder progress toward universal health coverage in Kazakhstan. Strengthening rural workforce and diagnostics is needed

Economic shortage · Health care · Health equity · Inequality · Qualitative research · Rural area · Rural health · Workforce · Global Health Workforce Issues · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms

  • Trends and risk factors of global incidence, mortality, and disability of genitourinary cancers from 1990 to 2019

    Open Access•Yi-Qun Tian, Yiqun Tian et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Rural-urban disparities in health outcomes, clinical care, health behaviors, and social determinants of health and an action-oriented, dynamic tool for visualizing them

    Open Access•William B Weeks, Ji Eun Chang et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae