A comparison of U.S. infant feeding policy changes to Global Breastfeeding Collective policy priorities
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22071068 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Paige B Harrigan, Paige Harrigan (0000-0001-6647-9593, Virginia Tech), Todd Schenk (0000-0002-3434-1319, Virginia Tech), Stella L Volpe (0000-0002-8593-320X, Virginia Tech), Valisa E Hedrick (0000-0002-1534-9198, Virginia Tech), Tuba Khan (0009-0003-8500-5555, Oklahoma State University), Sarah Misyak (0000-0002-4715-3464, Virginia Tech, autor de correspondencia), Sarah A Misyak |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Páginas | 1653377-1653377 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-09-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1653377 |
| PMID | 41041368 |
| OpenAlex | W4414299154 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 45 |
Introduction: Public policy plays an important role in shaping how infants are fed. The Global Breastfeeding Collective (GBC) provides a set of policy priorities for countries to promote, protect and support breastfeeding. The GBC uses scorecards to document progress toward meeting those priorities. The purpose of this study was to assess recent United States (U.S.) federal infant feeding policy changes against the GBC's policy priorities to identify areas of alignment and gaps for policies supporting optimal infant feeding. Methods: Changes in U.S. federal infant feeding legislation, regulation, and presidential documents between 2014 and 2023 were compared with and coded into GBC priority categories. Policy changes not aligned with GBC priorities were coded into additional non-GBC topic categories that were developed inductively. Results: Fifty-seven federal infant feeding policies were adopted or substantively modified within the study period. Of these, only 17 aligned with at least one of the GBC policy priorities. Forty-nine policies included changes that did not match GBC policy priorities. Policy changes that did not align with GBC priorities addressed infant formula manufacturing, lactation spaces, and breastfeeding supplies, among other topics. Conclusion: Although most recent federal infant feeding policy changes in the U.S. did not align with the breastfeeding policy priorities established by the GBC, opportunities to promote and protect breastfeeding were identified. Some U.S. breastfeeding policy changes outside of GBC priorities have potential to strengthen breastfeeding
Breast feeding · Breastfeeding · Infant feeding · Infant formula · Public policy · Breastfeeding Practices and Influences · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research · Health Policy
The Impact of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes on WHO-Recommended Breastfeeding Practices
Breastfeeding
Implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in Mexico
Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Paid Parental Leave Access
First‐food systems transformations and the ultra‐processing of infant and young child diets
Impact of the Covid‐19 pandemic on infant feeding practices in the United States
Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes
Real‐time evaluation can inform global and regional efforts to improve breastfeeding policies and programmes
The Association of State Law to Breastfeeding Practices in the US
The economic cost consequences of suboptimal infant and young child feeding practices
What Will It Take to Improve Breastfeeding Outcomes in the United States Without Leaving Anyone Behind
The Quiet Revolution
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Policy Coherence and Policy Domains
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |