Why patients’ knowledge alone isn’t enough
Examining behavioral and attitudinal gaps in gestational diabetes management among Chinese women
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22072022 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yan Liang (0000-0003-0072-7536, Qingdao University), Qingli Liu (0000-0001-7684-7118, Qingdao University), Xiaoyun Sun (0000-0001-5937-0733, Qingdao University), Yan Wang (0009-0009-9633-0023, Qingdao University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Páginas | 1589416-1589416 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-08-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589416 |
| PMID | 40917433 |
| OpenAlex | W4413368647 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 86 |
Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence is rising in China, necessitating an understanding of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among affected women to inform interventions. Methods This cross-sectional study (June 2020–June 2024) surveyed 3,426 Chinese women with GDM, aged 20–60 years, from urban and rural prenatal clinics across Qingdao city, China. A validated 25-item KAP questionnaire used a three-option response format (yes, no, maybe). Data were collected via WeChat in urban areas and paper-based surveys in rural regions (89% response rate), analyzed using chi-square tests and binary logistic regression. Results Significant KAP gaps emerged: 63% recognized GDM’s link to complications, but only 50% understood its comprehensive management, with 38% aware of eye exams and 40% of foot care needs. Practice adherence was poor—36% monitored blood glucose, 38% limited alcohol, and 53% practiced foot care, despite 59% adhering to medications. Attitudinally, 64% believed health-focused behavior drives management, yet only 36% viewed personal accountability as key, with 39% feeling providers understood their concerns. Intriguingly, younger women (20–30 years) were more open to education (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.94–3.69, p < 0.001), while illiteracy (OR 88.7, 95% CI 34.7–249, p < 0.001) and older age (51–60 years: OR 12.7, 95% CI 8.79–18.4, p < 0.001) predicted poor outcomes. Positive attitudes were protective (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.15–0.24, p < 0.001). Conclusion These findings reveal entrenched KAP barriers in GDM management, underscoring the need for innovative, equity-driven interventions—integrating accessible education, community empowerment, and digital tools—to enhance outcomes and reduce the GDM burden in China
Biology · Diabetes mellitus · Gestation · Gestational diabetes · Pregnancy · Clinical Psychology · Diabetes Management and Education · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Medicine · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Psychology · Endocrinology · Gerontology
The double burden of malnutrition
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes
Healthy China 2030
Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes
Health literacy and associated factors in China
Assessing perceptions of nursing knowledge, attitudes, and practices in diabetes management within Chinese healthcare settings
Health Literacy and Regional Heterogeneities in China
Monitoring the status of selected health related sustainable development goals
Self-management and self-efficacy of women with gestational diabetes mellitus
Beliefs about health and illness and health-related behavior among urban women with gestational diabetes mellitus in the south east of China
Effectiveness of a diabetes prevention program for rural women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward weight management among diabetic patients in Qidong City, Jiangsu Province
Smoking, heavy drinking, physical inactivity, and obesity among middle-aged and older adults in China
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of university students regarding Covid-19
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |