Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Digital social prescribing

A concept analysis

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22073000
AutoresYiming Zhang (0000-0003-3857-8433, Department of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital of Soochow University), Y J Zhang (0000-0002-0903-4931, Soochow University), Anwei Xie (0000-0002-3575-3913, Soochow University, autor de correspondencia), Ronghua Wang (0000-0003-3968-8212, Department of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital of Soochow University), Wang Ronghua (Soochow University), Yulin Fan (Soochow University)
Año2026
Volumen14
Fecha de publicación2026-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditorialFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1857845
OpenAlexW7166838458
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas51

Introduction Digital Social Prescribing (DSP) represents an innovative paradigm that integrates digital technologies into traditional social prescribing frameworks to address the social determinants of health (SDOH). However, persistent conceptual inconsistencies and a paucity of theoretical clarity have constrained its systematic application and evaluation within public health and nursing practices. Aims This study aims to clarify the definition of digital social prescribing, distinguish it from traditional social prescribing, and identify its core characteristics through a systematic concept analysis. Methods The Walker and Avant concept analysis framework was adopted. A comprehensive literature searches was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycArticles, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library. A total of 30 relevant articles were included in the analysis. The analysis followed eight steps proposed by Walker and Avant: selecting concept, determining purposes of the analysis, identifying all uses of concept, determining defining attributes, constructing model and related cases, identifying antecedents and consequences, and defining empirical referents. Results Digital social prescribing (DSP) is not merely a technological tool but a multidimensional public health model. Its five defining attributes are the uses of technology, non-clinical services, make personal plans based on needs, likes and location, community-based resources, and organizations from different sectors. The antecedents of DSP include contextual and population health drivers, medical systems and structural limitations, technological enabling factors, practice and implementation gaps and catalytic events and social development trends. The consequences of DSP encompass health and well-being outcomes, care and service delivery, system and implementation outcomes, equity and ethical considerations. Despite its potential benefits, DSP also faces challenges, including digital exclusion, data governance issues, gender imbalances and structural ethnic disparities. Conclusion This study provides a comprehensive conceptual framework for digital social prescribing (DSP), addressing existing conceptual ambiguities and clarifying its theoretical boundaries. The study also highlights the need to critically address potential challenges associated with DSP implementation, including digital exclusion, data governance concerns, gender imbalances and structural ethnic disparities. These findings support the development of standardized evaluation frameworks and provide guidance for future research, practice and policy aimed at facilitating the sustainable and equitable implementation of DSP

CINAHL · CLARITY · Conceptual framework · Digital health · Formal concept analysis · Health care · Population · Population health · Social determinants of health · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

  • eHeals

    Open Access•Cameron D Norman, Harvey A Skinner•Journal of Medical Internet…•2006

  • Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2021

  • Establishing internationally accepted conceptual and operational definitions of social prescribing through expert consensus

    Open Access•Caitlin Muhl, Kathleen Mulligan et al.•BMJ Open•2023

  • Community-based social healthcare practices in China for healthy aging

    Open Access•Rashid Menhas, Lili Yang et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Multi-Morbidity in the Older Person

    Open Access•Martin C Nwadiugwu•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Thematic analysis of how general practitioners perceive digital social prescribing as an intervention aiming at promoting psychosocial health and wellbeing in older adults

    Open Access•Rashid Menhas, Nasiru Mohammad Abdullahi et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Inclusive and effective teaching of Nature-Based Social Prescribing for allied health professional students within digital environments

    Open Access•S Pywell, C Wallace et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • The role of community assets in tackling UK health inequalities through community engagement and partnerships in social prescribing

    Open Access•Linda Thomson, Linda J M Thomson et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Global developments in social prescribing

    Open Access•Daniel F Morse, Sahil Sandhu et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • Adapting Digital Social Prescribing for Suicide Bereavement Support

    Open Access•Karen Galway, T L Forbes et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • The potentials of digital technology in social prescribing

    Open Access•Sima Rafiei, Mahsa Honary et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Sex differences in formal recommendation of assets for health (social prescribing) in Aragon

    Open Access•Marina Pola-García, Carmen Belén Benedé Azagra et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review

    Open Access•Kerryn Husk, Kelly Blockley et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2020

  • Connecting Dots to Bridge the Health Disparities Gap

    Giselle Corbie-Smith, Stephanie Hoover et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2019

  • Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Sustainability of the Mobile Health for Migrant Health (mHealth-4-Mhealth) Program

    Russell J McCulloh, Ellen Kerns et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2024

  • The Impact of a Bidirectional Clinic to Community Social Care Referral Program

    Shari D Bolen, Jonathan Lever et al.•Medical Care•2025

  • Examining the social prescription process

    Open Access•David Haynes, Maya Wedlow et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • Social prescribing and classed inequality

    Open Access•Kate Gibson, Tessa M Pollard et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2021

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae