“Palliative care is so much more than that”
A qualitative study exploring experiences of hospice staff and bereaved carers during the Covid-19 pandemic
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22073167 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Cara Bailey (0000-0003-0865-9240, University of Birmingham, autor de correspondencia), Ping Guo (0009-0006-9654-4011, University of Birmingham), John Macartney (0000-0002-0879-4277, University of Warwick), Anne Finucane (0000-0002-3056-059X, Marie Curie Hospice), Richard Meade (0000-0003-1262-0429), Susan Swan (0000-0003-1627-5431, Glasgow Life), Ellie Wagstaff (Marie Curie Hospice) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Páginas | 1139313-1139313 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-10-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1139313 |
| PMID | 38026434 |
| OpenAlex | W4388202823 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
Background: The way in which end-of-life care was provided changed significantly during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. The national lockdown restrictions reduced formal care support services and increased the burden on many carers taking on the caring role for the first time. We aimed to explore decision-making about the place of care during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on experience from the perspectives of carers and hospice staff caring for people at the end-of-life. Methods: A qualitative study using virtual interviews was conducted between October 2020 and April 2021. Data were analyzed thematically using framework analysis, an analytical framework that enables qualitative research to be organized into defined themes derived from the research question. Findings were presented to stakeholders in policy roundtables between March 2022 and March 2023 and discussed collaboratively with staff, stakeholders, and the public to inform policy and practice change. Findings: A total of 37 participants (15 bereaved carers and 22 staff) were recruited via hospice services in England and Scotland. Four key themes were identified: (1) changing preferences relating to decision-making about the place of care and the impact at the time of death and into bereavement; (2) missed opportunities related to not being there, not having others around, and being robbed of memory-making; (3) the lone carer during a period of high intensity and reduced home support; (4) process vs. person-centered care resulting from changing rules and restrictions and prioritization of regulations over essential palliative care. Conclusion: The study provides valuable global implications for all involved in end-of-life care. Despite great efforts to provide dignified, quality care, palliative care during the pandemic changed, focusing on essential 'physical care'. The psychological suffering experienced by staff and carers may need longer-term support mechanisms put in place, which will benefit from a public health approach. Policymakers should consider improving carer identification and resources for wider end-of-life care education to support the needs of carers, health and social care staff, and citizens
End-of-life care · Palliative care · Pandemic · Qualitative research · Sociology · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Medicine · Nursing · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |