Living during Covid-19
Qualitative analysis of Experts by Experience UK University Associates' socioeconomic inequalities, including readiness recommendations
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22074971 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Joy M Rooney (0000-0002-0985-7479, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Páginas | 1645667-1645667 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1645667 |
| PMID | 41103474 |
| OpenAlex | W4414690260 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 100 |
A vulnerable group of people with disabilities and carers (Experts by Experience) wished for research during the COVID-19 pandemic to assist other people with disabilities in the future. Consideration of this vulnerable group seems to be limited in future policy pandemic readiness despite huge potential mortality. Literature reviewed critical public health theory through assessing health inequalities and health equity in relation to disability/chronic ill health. A standard qualitative thematic method distinguished socioeconomic health inequalities for people with earlier mental/psychosocial distress and other Experts by Experience-including people with physical, visual, self-identified hidden disabilities, and their carers. Environmental, community, and individual challenge were part of the overarching theme. Up to five sub-themes were: shielding, diminished quality of life, use of social media vs. the digital divide, people with hidden disabilities, activism, celebrating lockdowns' ends, loss in stability of outlook, loneliness/isolation, coping strategies, developing new skills, re-evaluating lives because the world will change. Discussion of findings relied on four critical public health pillars; included were future recommendations for pandemic/emergency readiness
Health care · Health equity · Pandemic · Public health · Qualitative research · Social determinants of health · Socioeconomic status · Thematic analysis · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Health disparities and outcomes · Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the Covid-19 pandemic
Psychological Health and Physical Activity Levels during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine
Loneliness in the UK during the Covid-19 pandemic
Triple jeopardy
Physical activity, mental health and well-being of adults during initial Covid-19 containment strategies
Examining the impact of Covid-19 on stress and coping strategies in individuals with disabilities and chronic conditions.
Mental health problems and social media exposure during Covid-19 outbreak
Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting
Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to Covid-19 in England
Toward good practice in thematic analysis
Disability Studies
Covid-19
Regional Covid-19 measures and effects on subjective well-being in Germany
Mental health and life satisfaction among those advised to shield during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK
Lived experiences of people with intellectual disabilities during the Covid-19 pandemic from a crip time perspective
“Other People Thought I was Dirty or Crazy”
A four-level meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media and well-being
Smartphones, Disability and the Australian Experience of the Covid-19 Pandemic for People who are Blind and with Low Vision
Bioprecariousness and vulnerability
“Being really confidently wrong”
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Coverage of Allies, Allyship and Disabled People
The UK’s pandemic preparedness and early response to the Covid-19 pandemic
Character Strengths Across Disabilities
Differences in Unfavorable Lifestyle Changes during the Covid-19 Pandemic between People with and without Disabilities in Finland
Inequality-Related Health and Social Factors and Their Impact on Well-Being during the Covid-19 Pandemic
What is critical about critical public health? Focus on health inequalities
What Can Be Learned at the Intersection of Crisis Management and Administrative Burdens? Evidence From a Systematic Review of the Governance of Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme During Covid ‐19
Disabled People’s Experiences of the Coronavirus Pandemic
Public Participation in the Time of Covid‐19
What and Who Are “Essential”? A Disability Justice Perspective on Covid-19 Measures and the Diverse Disability Communities in Ontario
Covid-19 and the Crisis in Social Care
I’m not ok, we are not ok’
The global Covid-19 Disability Rights Monitor
Disabled people in Britain and the impact of the Covid ‐19 pandemic
Service User Involvement and Covid-19—An Afterthought
What's in a Name
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Lest we forget. Illuminating lived experience of the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown
Piercing the Pandemic Social Bubble
Disability, communication, and life itself in the Covid-19 pandemic
The Covid pandemic and social theory
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |