Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in Spain and associated factors
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22085404 |
|---|---|
| Autores | María Falcón Romero (0000-0002-5013-685X, Universidad de Murcia), Maria Falcon, Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez, Carmen Rodríguez‐Blázquez (0000-0003-3829-0675, Instituto de Salud Carlos III), María Romay-Barja, María Romay‐Barja (0000-0002-0177-6885, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, autor de correspondencia), Alba Ayala (0000-0001-8020-9020, Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud), Alfredo Burgos (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), María José De Tena-Dávila (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Maria João Forjaz (0000-0003-3935-962X, Instituto de Salud Carlos III) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Páginas | 1129079-1129079 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-03-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129079 |
| PMID | 37006532 |
| OpenAlex | W4327604781 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 28 |
Introduction The present study explores the reasons of those who have not been vaccinated in the later stage of the vaccine rollout in Spain and its associated determinants. Methods Cluster and logistic regression analyses were used to assess differences in claimed reasons for vaccine hesitancy in Spain using two samples of unvaccinated people (18–40 years old) gathered by an online cross-sectional survey from social networks ( n = 910) and from a representative panel ( n = 963) in October-November 2021. Results The main reasons for not being vaccinated were believing that the COVID-19 vaccines had been developed too fast, they were experimental, and they were not safe, endorsed by 68.7% participants in the social network sample and 55.4% in the panel sample. The cluster analysis classified the participants into two groups. Logistic regression showed that Cluster 2 (individuals who reported structural constraints and health-related reasons such as pregnancy or medical recommendation) presented a lower trust in information from health professionals, had a lower willingness to get vaccinated in the future, and avoided less social/family events than those in Cluster 1 (reasons centered in distrust on COVID-19 vaccines, conspiracy thoughts and complacency). Conclusions It is important to promote information campaigns that provide reliable information and fight fake news and myths. Future vaccination intention differs in both clusters, so these results are important for developing strategies target to increase vaccination uptake for those who do not reject the COVID-19 vaccine completely
Distrust · Environmental health · Family medicine · Logistic regression · Misinformation · Pandemic · Political science · Vaccination · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Demography · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Immunology
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of Covid-19
Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers
Beyond confidence
Public acceptance of Covid-19 vaccines
Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy
Vaccine hesitancy
The mediating role of health literacy on the relationship between health care system distrust and vaccine hesitancy during Covid-19 pandemic
Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Three Latin American Countries
Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy
An Overview of Strategies to Improve Vaccination Compliance before and during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Measuring health literacy in populations
Risk perceptions of Covid-19 around the world
Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of Covid-19 in the U.S
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |