Inequitable gender norms and its associated factors among university students in southern Ethiopia

A cross-sectional study, 2022

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22091064
AutoresYirgalem Tola Kelecha (0009-0000-8246-8528, Arba Minch University, autor de correspondencia), Amanuel Albene Ayele (Armauer Hansen Research Institute), Habtamu Samuel Goda (Arba Minch University), Mesarch Hailu Demissie (Arba Minch University), Temesgen Mohammed Toma (0000-0001-8849-6722)
Año2024
Volumen12
Páginas1462782-1462782
Fecha de publicación2024-12-19
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditorialFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2024.1462782
PMID39749246
OpenAlexW4405601153
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas32

Background Gender defined as the socially constructed roles, behaviors, activities, and characteristics that society deems appropriate for men, women, and other gender identities. Inequitable gender norms promote male dominance and aggressiveness while portraying women as being subservient. Ensuring equitable gender norms is a prerequisite for achieving gender equality in a society. The rise in maternal mortality and morbidity, adolescent pregnancies, unwanted pregnancies, unsafe abortions, HIV/AIDS, gender-based violence, and obstacles to reproductive health care are all linked to inequitable gender norms. On the other hand, not much is known regarding inequitable gender norms and their correlation in our setting. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate university students’ attitudes regarding inequitable gender norms and responsible factors. Design Between October 25 and November 10, 2022, students from Jinka and Arba Minch University participated in an institution-based cross-sectional study. Methods A total of 635 students were selected using a multi-stage sampling technique. The Gender Equitable Men Scale was employed to evaluate inequitable gender norms. Data were verified and entered into Epi-Data Version 3.1, then analyzed using SPSS Version 25.0. Binary logistic regression was initially used to identify potential factors associated with inequitable gender norms, variables having a p -value <0.25 in bivariate analysis considered for multivariable regression. The final model’s fit was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic, confirming its adequacy. Statistical significance was determined at a threshold of p < 0.05. Results Of the study participants, 44.1% (95% CI: 40.10, 48.10%) had an inequitable gender norm, while the mean score for a inequitable gender norm was 61.4 (SD 8.4). Inequitable gender norm was associated with sex being male (AOR = 1.75, 95%CI: 1.19, 2.56), romantic relationship breakup (AOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.99), and having a negative attitude toward gender equality (AOR = 3,14, 95% CI: 2.15, 4.58). Conclusion A notable number of participants expressed support for inequitable gender norms. This underscores the importance of comprehensive efforts by relevant stakeholders to address identified factors and promote equitable gender norms among university students

Cross-sectional study · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Sex and Gender in Healthcare