A Weighted Stacking Ensemble Model With Sampling for Fake Reviews Detection
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22108671 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rahul Singhal (0000-0001-7488-3799, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology), Rasha Kashef (0000-0002-3430-1536, Toronto Metropolitan University) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 2578-2594 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-04-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2329-924X • E-ISSN: 2373-7476 |
| Editorial | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1109/tcss.2023.3268548 |
| OpenAlex | W4372037265 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 63 |
Customers use reviews as a primary source of information to judge a product or service. Positive reviews help boost companies’ reputations, increasing their revenue by attracting new clients, and increasing the purchasing order size. On the other hand, negative reviews significantly reduce sales, which might be the case due to competitive advantage. Organizations can use fake (i.e., misleading or fraudulent) reviews to generate fast profits by deceiving customers into buying their products. Recently, various methods to assess the legitimacy of reviews have been introduced using advances in machine learning. However, existing methods fall short of achieving highly accurate detection results for unbalanced classes. We aimed to create a spam review identification model using ensemble-based learning while balancing classes using sampling techniques. This article proposes a weighted stacking ensemble model with sampling (WSEM-S) for efficient fake reviews detection. We used $n$ -gram models to effectively model language data for feature retrieval. The experimental results on three customer reviews datasets: YELPNYC, Deceptive Opinion Spam Corpus (DOSC) v1.4, and Deception datasets show that the proposed model outperforms the conventional machine learning techniques [Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and convolutional neural network (CNN)] as well as the state-of-the-art ensemble models
Convolutional neural network · Data mining · Deception · Deep learning · Ensemble forecasting · Ensemble learning · Feature engineering · Machine learning · Naive Bayes classifier · Purchasing · Random forest · Support vector machine · Vendor · Computer Science · Engineering · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Spam and Phishing Detection · Artificial Intelligence
Fake It Till You Make It
Smote
Bagging predictors
Random Forests
Fake reviews on online platforms
Detecting and Characterizing Extremist Reviewer Groups in Online Product Reviews
Welfake
Identifying Groups of Fake Reviewers Using a Semisupervised Approach
Two-Path Deep Semisupervised Learning for Timely Fake News Detection
Defensive Modeling of Fake News Through Online Social Networks
| Citas por año | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Altamente citado | No |