Is Abortion the Only Issue

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22109232
AutoresDustin Crummett (0000-0003-1508-1184, University of Washington Tacoma, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen9
Número0
Fecha de publicación2023-03-31
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaErgo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2330-4014 • E-ISSN: 2330-4014
EditorialUniversity of Michigan Library (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3998/ergo.2270
OpenAlexW4362474823
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas22

The Embryo Rescue Case asks us to consider whether we should save a fully-developed child or a tray full of many embryos from a fire. Most people pick the child. This allegedly provides evidence against the view that embryos have the same moral status as developed humans. Pro-life philosophers usually grant that you should save the child, but say that this doesn’t undermine the claim that embryos possess full moral status. There may be reasons besides differing moral status to save the child. Meanwhile, many ordinary pro-life people think that stopping abortion is far and away the most morally urgent socio-political issue. They reason that since abortion (in their view) consists in the unjust killing of so many human persons, fighting it should be an overwhelming priority. Here I argue that this way of reasoning about the urgency of combating abortion (given the pro-life view) conflicts with the usual response to the Embryo Rescue Case. If the fact that you should save a developed human rather than many more embryos doesn’t imply that embryos lack personhood, then embryonic personhood doesn’t imply that you should save embryos rather than many fewer developed humans

Abortion · Biology · Environmental ethics · Human life · Personhood · Political science · Politics · Pregnancy · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Philosophy · Reproductive Health and Technologies