Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Analyzing Women's Studies Dissertations

Methodologies, Epistemologies, and Field Formation

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2222942
AutoresSally L Kitch (0000-0001-8756-5810, Gender Studies), Mary Margaret Fonow
Año2012
Volumen38
Número1
Páginas99-126
Fecha de publicación2012-09-01
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0097-9740 • E-ISSN: 1545-6943
EditorialUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/665801
OpenAlexW2085343202
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas5

This study presents an in-depth analysis of women’s studies doctoral dissertations produced in the United States between 1995 and 2008. We identified 117 total dissertations and coded their topics, themes, and methodologies. We found eight dominant dissertation topics: identity/subjectivity, gender norms, resistance/activism/power, cultural texts, nationalism/citizenship, harassment/violence/victimization/trauma, race, and sexuality. While humanities-based methodologies, particularly historical and representational, dominate the sample, they are often combined with qualitative or ethnographic methods, particularly interviewing. Regardless of the methods employed or discussed, reflexivity, lived experience, and agency constituted the core of feminist methodology for many dissertation writers. We analyze the successes and challenges of producing interdisciplinary dissertations in freestanding women’s studies programs and provide an analysis of a select number of dissertations purposefully chosen to reflect larger trends. Challenges discussed include failure to specify (with precision) key terms such as intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and transnationality; not providing a sufficient discussion of feminist methodology to justify the link between argumentation and evidence; not choosing topics outside of the writer’s comfort zone; and not problematizing the connection between experience, identity, and knowledge. We conclude with recommendations for improving dissertation advising and promoting innovation, which range from strengthening the fundamentals of research design and writing to clarifying the unique characteristics and appropriate assumptions of the field as a whole

Agency (philosophy) · Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Identity (music) · Intersectionality · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Subjectivity · Disability Rights and Representation · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Studies

  • The impact of gender-blindness on social-ecological resilience

    Open Access•Lemlem Aregu, Ika Darnhofer et al.•AMBIO•2016

  • Knowledge Ecologies, "Supple" Objects, and Different Priorities Across Women's and Gender Studies Programs and Departments in the United States, 1970-2010

    Open Access•Christine V Wood•Journal of the History of the…•2015

  • A Report on the Academic Job Market in Gender, Women's, Sexuality, Feminist, and Queer Studies, 2006-2018

    Jigna Desai, Elizabeth A Wilson et al.•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2023

  • Disciplined by Disciplines? The Need for an Interdisciplinary Research Mission in Women's Studies

    Judith Allen, Judith A Allen et al.•Feminist Studies•1998

  • Learning from the Outsider Within

    Patricia Hill Collins•Social Problems•1986

  • Signs 2005-2015

    Mary Hawkesworth•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2011

  • The Evidence of Experience

    Joan W Scott•Critical Inquiry•1991

  • Feminist Methodology

    Mary Margaret Fonow, Judith A Cook et al.•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2005

Citas por año0,27
Intervalo de citas2015 - 2023 (9)
Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae