Moral attitudes towards effort and efficiency
A comparison between American and Chinese history
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22236772 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Amber Xuqian Chen (0000-0003-3359-9075, University of California, Santa Barbara), Shaojing Sun (0000-0003-2189-5336, Fudan University), Hongbo Yu (0000-0002-3384-7772, University of California, Santa Barbara, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Número | 1 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-08-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-024-03603-3 |
| OpenAlex | W4401888070 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 75 |
In some cultures, merely exerting effort is considered virtuous, even when the effort is inefficient. Our study examines how this moral attitude towards effort (relative to efficiency) has evolved historically across two distinct sociopolitical and linguistic contexts: the People’s Republic of China and the United States, using natural language processing techniques. Specifically, two formal political corpora were used—the People’s Daily (1950–2021) and the Congressional speeches for the U.S. (1873–2011). We developed dictionaries for each concept based on pre-trained word embedding models in both languages. Moral attitudes towards effort and efficiency were calculated on a year-by-year basis as the cosine similarity between the dictionaries of these concepts and an existing dictionary of morality. We benchmarked the fluctuations of moral attitude towards inefficient effort against critical historical events in the two countries. Additional time series analysis and Granger tests revealed the association and potential directionality between the evolution of moral attitude towards inefficient effort and critical socio-cultural variables such as collectivism and cultural looseness. Our research sheds light on the historical and socio-cultural roots of moralization of effort and has implications for historical psychology research on moral attitudes
Political science · Cultural Differences and Values · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Morality ‘East’ and ‘West’
Foundations of Chinese Psychology
Automatic Time Series Forecasting
Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information
Morality in everyday life
Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices
The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD)
The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation
Psychology as a Historical Science
Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes
WordNet
Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide
On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness.
The Changing Psychology of Culture From 1800 Through 2000
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Cultural evolution over the last 40 years in China
Moral Foundations Theory
Digitally-disadvantaged languages
Choosing Money Over Meaningful Work
Difficulty-as-Improvement
Evolution of emotion semantics
Moral concerns are differentially observable in language
Unraveling moral and emotional discourses on social media
Uneasy Street
The MAD Model of Moral Contagion
Self as Cultural Product
The protestant work ethic
Oldsters and Ngrams
Stereotypical Gender Associations in Language Have Decreased Over Time
Confucian economics
Aging Narratives Over 210 Years (1810–2019)
Effort counts
Moral Values and Voting
Class attitudes and the American work ethic
Morality beyond the Weird
Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History
The loosening of American culture over 200 years is associated with a creativity-order trade-off
The cultural evolution of love in literary history
The Implicit Legacy of American Protestantism
Tools from moral psychology for measuring personal moral culture
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |